this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2026
139 points (88.0% liked)

Canada

12396 readers
410 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 96 points 5 days ago (8 children)

And i am very serious about killing any doodle who sets foot in this country with that intent.

I don't care if i die.

I am not living undet the rule of people who worship curtis yarvin.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 64 points 5 days ago (3 children)

MAGA dipshits severely underestimate how many Canadians would actually enjoy taking a break from the rat race to repel invaders.

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.ca 41 points 5 days ago (19 children)

Asymmetrical warfare is our thing

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 29 points 5 days ago (2 children)

That and inventing new war crimes.

[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 31 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They're not war crimes the first time

[–] mosaic09@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

I'd be very disappointed if the Geneva convention didn't get updated afterwards if this war happens

[–] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 23 points 5 days ago

Everybody needs a hobby.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (5 children)

I wouldn't. Why conduct the destructive mess that is a war in our own living room?

I'd contribute to any effort to make long range drones that strike energy and electronic infrastructure deep inside the US instead.

Keep the destruction over there. Watch American arrogance melt away as they realize that fighting a war isn't just some thing they send troops elsewhere to die over while they get to stay comfy and safe at home anymore.

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 23 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The answer is going to be both.

Drones are the future of warfare. Ukraine has proven that.

But if the US decides to invade, it absolutely WILL send troops over the border. And we'll be there, shooting them down. Carney may have to undo Trudeau's silly handgun restrictions for us RPAL holders for the good of Canada.

I'm too old to be a soldier, but I can still hold a rifle. I'm not a violent person, but I will defend my country. I don't believe that most people in the US support this, but I will shoot to kill any that come across the border with plans to invade.

In my nearly 60 years on this planet, this is the first time I've said I will die defending my country.

So yes, in a situation of war we support drones. We support attacks deep within US territory, rather than traditional face-to-face combat.

But we will do whatever it takes to protect our country.

[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 16 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Almost 70 and cannot walk but 2 metres at a time. Strap a bomb to my scooter and I will drive into a bunch of em and blow them up.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Plenty of Americans are hoping a dumb ass move like that is enough to weaken the morons in charge and join your side.

Like both coasts and most of the bordering states would have majorities on Canada’s side.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 37 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The title seems to be generating confusion, but the author's point is that there are billionaire oligarchs (not just Trump, people whose power is not term-limited) pushing to gain control of Canada's resources. He's not talking about ordinary Americans nor is he necessarily talking about an invasion or a war.

The playbook here is generally to apply economic pressure with the aim of causing political discontent, while at the same time financing an opposition faction that's more pliable, like they're doing against Cuba, Afghanistan, Iran, etc.

[–] GardenGeek@europe.pub 12 points 5 days ago

Sounds like the same play book that is used with great success in Europe currently.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] arin@lemmy.world 45 points 5 days ago (7 children)

I'm american, and NOPE i am not, the Trump & Co are tho

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] remnant2652@piefed.world 37 points 5 days ago (5 children)

I'm American (unfortunately) and I want no part in annexing any country. I actually can't recall anyone else here who does... Well except big orange wrinkly pimples in DC.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ProudCanadianCitizen@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It’s time for Canadians to start referring to California’s governor as the President of California, and refer to California itself as the country of California. Even Californians are now doing that.

Congressman Eric Swalwell, a candidate for Governor of California, recently referred to California as “the greatest country in the world.” CalExit.Now concurs with the substance of that claim. CalExit.Now will continue to advance California sovereignty as the governing framework most capable of delivering outcomes that Californians consistently demand.

Also

SACRAMENTO, Calif., March 12, 2026 /PRNewswire/ – CalExit.Now, the movement advocating for California sovereignty, today released a statement marking a historic shift in statewide public opinion. A recent California poll reports that, for the first time since polling on this question began, a majority of Californians now either strongly support, or do not oppose, pursuing California sovereignty. The combined figure stands at 51 percent.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/calexit-now-announces-majority-support-100000068.html

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 4 days ago (9 children)

It's one American in particular pushing it, so it's a bit funny to use plural, but yes, he means it.

[–] droopy4096@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 days ago (3 children)

as article points out: that one person is supported by a whole class of Americans - the billionaires. And those in turn are supported by not insignificant portion of American population. So plural is very apropos here.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And 1/3 follow without reservation.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

And another 1/3 don't care what happens.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 31 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I’m 51 and would murder every single American that entered here and tried to take away my country, freedom and my family.

I’d die, but I’d hopefully murder a fuckload of yanks before that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca 19 points 5 days ago (14 children)

Get your gun license. I'm not kidding.

You don't have to own a gun. Just learn how they work so when push comes to shove, you'll be ready.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I'm in California, Canada - please annex us. We can draw up a map of the places you should leave behind. You know, the conservative ones.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The problem being we only have a slightly larger population, so it'd be pretty close to you annexing us. That's not really the end of the world, TBH, but for many Canadians it would be a dealbreaker. Cutting off the rural bits would help, but not much since they're rural (and, honestly, we could use some domestic produce growing, anyway).

It's just one of the biggest states in one of the most populous countries.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

Convince Oregon and Washington to come too, I want to be able to drive to my new vacation spot.

[–] ProudCanadianCitizen@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

Hey, California -- wake up!!!! You do not need to be part of Canada to survive. Your economy is already fifth in the entire world, of all other countries, in GDP. Far ahead of Canada. You would 100% survive and prosper. Once you stop sending you're hard-earned tax dollars to Washington, but instead fund everything Washington funds with your own tax dollars, you are still billions of dollars ahead. By any measure, California is a lot better off as an independent country than as a US state.

You already have a credible National Guard air and land force that would for the basis of a defense force.

The referendum in 2028 can make or break your future.

SACRAMENTO, Calif., March 12, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- CalExit.Now, the movement advocating for California sovereignty, today released a statement marking a historic shift in statewide public opinion. A recent California poll reports that, for the first time since polling on this question began, a majority of Californians now either strongly support, or do not oppose, pursuing California sovereignty. The combined figure stands at 51 percent.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/calexit-now-announces-majority-support-100000068.html

[–] neutronbumblebee@mander.xyz 21 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

I could see it happening in bite sized pieces. Just like Ukraine really. Annex a small area, wait till the protests die down then repeat. I'm sure Vladimir would be cheering that on. After all great nuclear powers do whatever they want, don't they.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 15 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

They'll be aiming to crush Canada economically until Albertans are sure they want to go it alone. Then they can start physically dismantling the country, starting with Alberta, and intensifying the economic pressure on the rest until Canada submits to de facto US rule. They can formalize it later with humilitating treaties and guns.

Canada needs to work quickly on economic and military independence. Our whole international position needs to change before the USA really gets going with the program. And Canada needs to figure out how to make it very painful for the USA if it attempts anything. If ever the USA invades, we need to already be there inside their country, physically and virtually, making life hard for them in surprising ways. And we need to build up alliances until they're so strong that it becomes uncomfortable for our allies to flake out and go along with the USA.

[–] EtnaAtsume@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

Yeah the people in here who are imagining some kind of WW2-esque total-war scenario are not living in reality...

I mean, I get it. It's heroic and satisfying to imagine oneself going down in a blaze of glory or getting into a firefight or a slugfest with a bunch of boots-on-the-ground foreign invaders, but that's not the century we're in.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ContactClosure@lemmus.org 11 points 4 days ago (4 children)

It's really just a few of us, but they control the media and military so that sucks.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 14 points 5 days ago

Yeah that's the thing you have to remember about this flood the Zone shit Trump does. None of it's a distraction. All of it's a distraction. Both at the same time. He means it all.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

Who knew Trump took Canadian Bacon (the movie) so seriously.

[–] discomatic@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't like guns but I am a very good shot with a rifle. I'm also a menopausal woman. I fucking dare him.

Isn't it a point of honour with these creeps that an enemy has never set foot on American soil? Bet.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›