this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2026
101 points (98.1% liked)

science

28872 readers
751 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 25 points 22 hours ago

The brain drain is going to devastate science in the US for generations. Totally squandered in a matter of a couple years.

[–] el_twitto@lemmy.zip 2 points 14 hours ago

Trump is obviously a Russian asset. EVERYTHING HE HAS DONE HAS BENEFITTED PUTIN.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 17 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

What researchers? A lot of them just up and left when Trump started his shit.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The ones without the resources to just up and leave.

[–] sportsjorts@lemmy.zip 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)
[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

And as we all know, all researchers are equally as capable.

[–] Sergio@piefed.social 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

If you’re good at what you do money isn’t an issue.

Hey, what about those of us who are old and mediocre (but capable!) at what we do?!?

[–] sportsjorts@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago

We get a convoy going.

[–] ZMoney@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Europe too.

[–] squeeb@quokk.au 2 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

As a non-US resident that doesn't much read the news, is there any particular reason for the comparison of 'now' vs '6 months ago'? Has there been a particular change in policy or some other big event in the US that's motivated the sudden change in attitude?

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

US federal budgeting this year have pushed hard to gut science. I've heard talking points regurgitated by college educated folks that businesses will pay for it instead, but when pressed for examples or how it would work they are only able to point to engineering projects, they can't differentiate between basic scientific research producing testable, accurate models and the products and services built using this models.

[–] DrPop@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Businesses will pay for studies that help businesses or had a profit incentive. When you hear the govt spent a large sum of money studying how ocelots react to opium or somelike that, people usually say that's a waste of money, rather than finding out why.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Like there was one Republican complaint about studying soybeans. Beans! Useless!

Yeah well guess what one of the biggest crops in the US is. We used to export soy to Asia.

https://www.agri-pulse.com/articles/23114-opinion-the-trump-administration-is-wrong-about-the-value-of-crop-research-labs-and-farmers-know-it

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

yeah, Trump.

Not that things weren't kind of shitty before, he just accelerated the problems by defunding science and preventing foreigners from coming here to study, which sadly make up many 1/3 of the students of our PhD programs, especially hard sciences.

higher education in the USA needs systematically reform, but I don't think anything Trump has done has improved anything, just accelerated the issues by turning off the money/labor spigot so many research programs were overly-reliant on.

a lot of this talented foreign labor is now going to study in other countries rather than the USA and that will impact things for decades, reducing USA's lead in many scientific fields.

[–] crpknkr@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

"... money / labor spigot so many research programs were overly-reliant on."

I don't see how research or more generally anything at all could get done without money or labor.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -1 points 17 hours ago

I know it’s “science” but there’s too many articles where someone’s run a basic survey on the obvious that gets reported as “obviousness observed”