They are throwing everything they can at the wall to see what sticks so they can destroy whats left of the US government and start their long wished for civil war. They want a monarchy, and they have the US militarys backing to get it.
this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2026
341 points (97.2% liked)
politics
31119 readers
2269 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I said this was going to happen weeks ago and people here on lemmy were calling me stupid
Both can be true
The deep conspiracy theory is that this whole case is fabricated to create toxic man vs women discourse because racism isn't distracting enough right now.
This case is basically an exact copy of a case that apparently happened in Ireland 3 years ago that caused a lot or controversy.
if true I'm pleased that racism isnt working well enough for them. And I don't think sexism will work well enough for them either.
There’s some in the comments saying the same. That’s what I heard about Roe v Wade as well and look where we are.
The erosion of women’s rights has been happening and is continuing to happen. Don’t let anyone gaslight you about this.
Not just women's rights but the rights of anyone that isn't a richwhiteman.
YES
This will last only as long as women keep paying taxes. No taxation w/o representation, amirite? Once men and business partners see the light and start putting the capital of their ventures and earnings in to their tax-free partner’s hands.. It’s a lot of hot air..
It wasn't until the 70s that women were protected from discrimination when opening their own bank accounts. It's not like they're particularly opposed to taking away our access to financial institutions.
load more comments
(38 replies)
A mentally ill woman kills her kids, so women shouldn't be able to vote?
What happens when a mentally ill man shoots a bunch of random people?
Most of them are completely opposed to voting. They are trying to exclude only a portion of the current electorate, as it is more difficult to convince a significant part of the population to support the total abolition of elections.
That's what bugs me, the double standards. If a female led superhero movie sucks, Hollywood is afraid to invest in female led superhero movies. If a male led superhero movie sucks, oh well, shit happens.
If a woman does something wrong, it's on all women. If a black person does something wrong, it's on all black people. If an immigrant does something wrong, it's on all immigrants. If a transgender person does a mass shooting or a transgender person's partner shoots someone, it's used against all transgender people. But if a white cis man rapes and murders, it isn't seen as a reflection of their demographic
Well, it really seems that Hollywood wants them to fail.
Don't remember what the term was. Glass cliff? Something like that?
There's a theory that women get put in charge/lead roles when people can tell shit is about to hit the fan.
Glass ceiling.
The glass ceiling is an invisible, unwritten barrier that stops women and minority groups from getting top jobs in management and leadership, no matter how skilled or hardworking they are.
No, not that. It's specifically "oh shit this is gonna happen and fuck up earning next three quarters, let's get a woman CEO before then"
Well would you look at that, I hadn't heard about this one before. It is called the "Glass Cliff" theory! Thanks for mentioning it
This is a well-documented phenomenon in business and politics where women (and minorities) are preferentially promoted to leadership roles during times of crisis, recession, or severe organizational distress.
But if a white cis man rapes and murders, it isn’t seen as a reflection of their demographic
And if you point it out or dare to speak about cis white men in isolation, you're called a misandrist.
Conservatism is about unequality. For them it's just "nature" to collectively punish all people belonging to a given group that are less powerful.
If you're part of a more powerful group, all your grievances with a group are automatically justified. If not, even if they were justified, you have to show the moral high ground by not acting out on them.
load more comments
(28 replies)
"All the women are telling us we're wrong. We should probably take their voices away."
Typical fucking conservative logic. I hate these people
Also they missed the much more obvious conclusion: the lone holdout juror was a man with no evidence, no logic, and all emotion. Shouldn't we take away men's voting rights instead? /s
I'm sure the problem is 100 times worse if you flip the genders
view more: next ›