this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2026
87 points (96.8% liked)

politics

31112 readers
2196 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The world’s richest man is spending at least $100 million on the midterm elections to support the Republican Party and his far-right agenda. But it looks like Elon Musk’s focus won’t be the economy, or the war in Iran or artificial intelligence. It won’t be his repellent ideas about race and his advocacy for “white solidarity.” Instead, Musk has come out of the gate with a barrage of ads targeting Democrats for not being sufficiently supportive of discrimination against transgender Americans.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 58 minutes ago

Press X to doubt.

As stupid as it is, the "men in women's sports" bullshit as well as the "save the children" narratives and even the decade-old bathroom bills seems to occupy the minds of a non-zero amount of idiots.

"I don't have a job and I'm going to have to declare bankruptcy to get life-saving healthcare, but holy shit, do you know there are men playing in a women's sport I only derisively laughed at previously?!!!!1111"

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

When trans people are harmed by ingrain bigots getting riled up by this kind of shit, then it has already worked.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 17 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

You'd have to be mentally ill to be the richest man on the planet, have a trans kid, and still rate this as a top priority of your politics.

It shows how propagandized gender differences are, that anyone questioning the standard is seen by insecure straight men as icky to this degree of motivation.

There's something wrong with Elon.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

have a trans kid

This is the only reason he cares. He purchased Twitter over this. This is all about him feeling emasculated because one of his twelve sons turned out to be a daughter.

[–] X@piefed.world 9 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

You'd have to be mentally ill…

He is.

There's something wrong with Elon.

He’s mentally ill.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

Nothing wrong with being mentally ill, but there's something wrong when society denies it and pretends you're still capable, fit and rational.

[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 14 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Republicans have spent trillions talking about less than 1% of the population, and so far it's distracted about 49% of people who vote

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

More Republican politicians have raped children than trans people have.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

True, though not exceedingly relevant

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

The anti-trans ads work both ways.

Of course they'll work. All they need to do is add a small lead to their baseline turnout(*) and they'll win it. Source: watching this tactic work every election for decades.

* or cut turnout from their opponent. same thing.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 52 minutes ago

This is the group that famously used push polls against McCain having an illegitimate black love child. That had "Bush's brain" put anti-gay marriage initiatives in battleground states to turn out cons for voting against gay marriage, etc.

The cons don't get their base to vote for them based on logic. It's all vibes and fear of the other. This time around it's trans.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

If you look at voting rates, it's not the GOP that decides elections, it's the Democrats. GOP almost always gets ~63m votes. Democrats range 63+/-5m.

That's why the both sides rhetoric steps up around election season. Republicans will vote consistently, and they win if a couple Democrats stay home.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

Exactly. And also why the wedge ads and russian bot farms work so well; It hurts Democrats either way.

When that +/-5m gets wobbly, it’s a republican winner.

[–] KulunkelBoom@lemmus.org 2 points 5 hours ago

Somehow it comes out slightly different from a full fledged nazi than it does from an orange faced shitbag criminal. Musk the nazi isn't near as charismatic as the shitbag mad king.

[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

If you're going to embed the Twitter links in your post from the article, perhaps at least replace them with nitter links for user convenience and privacy?