this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2026
47 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

12402 readers
455 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 hours ago

Capitalism puts capital above all else, the US has more capital than Canada so they will benefit the most from this system.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 14 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Ignoring data sovereignty for a moment: Carney's investment summit will probably push that further.

[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You know the attendees of that conference were Canadian pension funds, right?

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Do you have a source stating the investors were only domestic?

[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago

Looks like it's a smattering of everyone.

I have mixed feelings at present moment. Having infrastructure domestically is critical for our sovereignty and time-restricted targetted tax breaks for bringing jobs here can be a net positive for the economy, as long as you don't get addicted to the high. Which I think is likely.

[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Just going off the PMO's presser, I haven't seen a complete guest list. List was Sunlife etc al, TD et al, etc.

I'm sure it wasn't exclusively domestic, but of the specific "investments" announced, all were domestic that I saw.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Larry Fink (CEO, BlackRock), Annette Mosman (CEO, APG Groep N.V.), Jonathan Gray (CEO, Greystone) and Dilhan Pillay Sandrasegara (CEO, Temasek Holdings) ...

C.S. Venkatakrishnan (CEO, Barclays) and Christian Sewing (CEO, Deutsche Bank)

https://www.cpac.ca/headline-politics/episode/canada-investment-summit-afternoon-panel-discussions

I think the pmo announced that that summit was being held in partnership with a bunch of pension funds, but the point was to attract international investment.

[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 hours ago

Yeah I found similar info a few hours ago when I commented "a smattering of everyone".

I don't have an outright issue with seeking foreign capital to help fund domestic projects, so long as GoC continues to own the underlying assets and infrastructure. The devil will be in the details as to how good or bad any particular investment will be.

Generally speaking I wish Canadian pension funds and banks were more interested in national projects and less interested in REITs. Japan's managed to build much of their infrastructure by having 30 year+ investors (pensions) fund 30 year+ projects. Ours just buy REITs and hope line go up, adding nothing to our fundamentals.

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Foreign isn't a problem. American is

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Yes and no. No other country currently says they will operate in a host country and obey American laws even when in conflict with the host country. But any country could, ownership does matter for critical infra.

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 10 points 12 hours ago

If we're talking critical infrastructure the problem is that anyone can own it at all. Billionaires don't care about citizenship. Foreign or Canadian individuals and corporations owning public goods is a problem in itself