this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2026
608 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

88112 readers
3915 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago
[–] Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone 121 points 1 day ago (2 children)

ITT: person deserves life changing debt and losing his job because he made a mistake

Cmon yall, you can be critical of someone's actions while also recognizing 6 figures of debt is absurd and not a reasonable outcome of this.

What really should be the case is that the dad learns his lesson, loses company card access, kid learns his lesson, google writes it off, and the kid's account is permanently banned.

We don't need to ruin someone's life for this

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 67 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Legally, the kid wasn't old enough to contract the ads.

It would not stand in court.

I question using his work card to pay for some robucks for his kid.

I question that his credit card was saved for Robucks, but was able to be used on Google Ads.

I would not be surprised if he lost his job. I think that's not unreasonable though the economy sucks.

[–] Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Losing his job is a 50/50 IMO. We don't know how his dad performed at work, if this is his first offense, etc. If all goes well, the dad gets google to write off the cost. Then the company sees that as a learning lesson and just revokes his card access. On the other hand, it could mean he is fired if he has already racked up other violations.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're probably running unlimited Amex. Google should legally have to write off the ad spend and cease the account.

100k offense from negligence. I've not worked anywhere that would shrug that off. Of course, he could be family or otherwise protected.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 1 points 5 hours ago

100k offense from negligence. I’ve not worked anywhere that would shrug that off. Of course, he could be family or otherwise protected.

I've seen negligence cause costs approaching 100k at my current job (and thankfully leadership has changed so that isn't happening anywhere near as much) but the way I see it, if he's a really good employee and Google writes off the charges he could possibly narrowly keep his job. But I don't see him keeping his job if Google doesn't write off the ad fees. (Barring of course being owner/family to owners)

[–] epicstove@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 day ago

Right?

I swear people hearing stories like this want the absolute worst outcomes for everyone possible with 0 empathy.

He likely used the company credit card once, got some pop-up and instinctively clicked "yes" as most people do causing the card to be saved to the browser.

I'm sure the dad will find a way to reverse the damage (or at least greatly minimize it) and both will have learned their lesson.

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 3 points 18 hours ago (2 children)
[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 1 points 7 hours ago

Have you watched the video?

[–] BananaLama@lemmy.ml 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip -3 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Because he couldn't educate his child enough

  • to know he couldn't spend that much on a whim
  • to know minecraft videos aren't gonna be profitable starting solo in 2026
  • to even feel bad at all for what he did
  • to even realize how massive of a fuckup he just made after his dad found out

That child is done for.

[–] OccasionallyFeralya@lemmy.ml 13 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The child is 9 be realistic

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip -2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

then I must have been a genius at 9 because I got an overcharge of like $10 on my phone subscription at about that age and when my dad told me I was mortified at what I had just done

My parents would never tell us what the money situation is, which is both a curse and a blessing. They would just say there was no money for it so I didn't understand the concept that well. Took high school to learn about balancing checkbooks and such to fully comprehend what they were saying.

I think parents should have a talk to their kids about finances in general though, not the nitty gritty, but understand how much goes into X to ensure Y. To find out the real value of a dollar in a more tangible way so they know, when mom and dad say they have $1K at the end of the month, that's a hard cap, and they may soft cap it to keep savings for emergencies.

[–] Duhtocqueville@ttrpg.network 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

This post is making me realize the position I’m in and how I got here.

My seven year old has my old switch, and uses that account. He always asks before buying anything and has never bought anything without permission. But he uses my Nintendo account, which is linked to my PayPal, which is linked to my credit card.

This card used to have something like $7000 limit. Last I checked though it’s at 32k limit. I should probably set some kind of spending limit just in case on this setup.

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 hours ago

yes...please. Before you get a legal battle or some stuff like that on your hands...

[–] LaggyKar@programming.dev 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

to know minecraft videos aren’t gonna be profitable starting solo in 2026

How is this something you'd expect from a dad?

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip -4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

because it's common sense that spending over 100k while earning 0 is not profitable

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 67 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why is a nine year old on you tube, worse with their own channel?

[–] Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It's kind of the lemonade stand of our time. Get some feel for how markets work, and exercise some generally applicable skills (video editing).

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 5 points 13 hours ago

Hell no it isn't. I would never let my nine year old have a youtube channel.

I kind of get what you are driving at, but the huge difference is the kid actually runs the stand, and the customers are (likely) friends and neighbors.

Not some major profit corporation trying to use you as a product to sell ads.

[–] bertlewirth@lemy.lol 6 points 19 hours ago

Parents don’t parent anymore.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Dave said he entered the company card himself to buy Robux for his son, and it then sat saved on the Google account that also carries his work email, calendar, and files. Dave did not say why he used the company card for that purchase.

Well I don’t have much sympathy here. He used the company card to buy his son Robux. There was no reason to do this, he should have used his personal card. So maybe he thought he could skim a little money off the top for personal use and it ended up biting him in the ass.

[–] Caesium@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

don't you typically have to confirm if you want to save a card to your account as well? like I get pop-ups every time I manually type in my card cause I don't trust websites saving that info for more than I need it to. My parents specifically never saved their cards onto my sibs and my accounts to avoid frivolous spending. it's an awful situation to be in, but the dad kinda reaped what he sowed here

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Roblox keeps the kid occupied and thus makes dad more efficient at his job. It's a legit expense.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was thinking the same thing... At my job if you have a company card, you have to explain ever cent spent on it every month at a minimum. How did he not have a difficult conversation with someone when he bought fucking Robux on the company card??

[–] Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 18 hours ago

At my company the direct manager approves the detail - although if the total looks reasonable for the assignment they don't scrutinize individual expenses - then above that there are automated flagging checks only. If mixed in with legit expenses, and the description or vendor type or whatever didn't trigger the automated flagging, $20 for something inappropriate would never be caught.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

So the goal was $20 on an ad campaign? Might as well light a $20 bill on fire. That won’t move the needle at all. Also why does a Minecraft channel of a nine year old need a advertising campaign. A nine year old has all the time in the world to learn how to make compelling content and grow organically. The goal for a nine year old shouldn’t be high subscriber/viewer count. The dad could have turned it into a teaching moment when the kid complained about low viewership instead of throwing money at it no matter how small it was supposed to be

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 57 points 1 day ago

Might as well have been a teaching moment.

"Here's 20 bucks, let's run some ads and see how it impacts your channel"

"Didn't change much? Well, wouldn't you rather spend that money on something else instead?"

Part of teaching kids about the Internet is showing what ads are, the way companies use them and that there's always a reason you're getting shown them

As a kid I wanted some shitty toy and my mom went "well, if that's what you want to spend your allowance on, sure. But I think it's probably not as good as you think", only for me to realize that she was right after I got it

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The perils of shitty parenting.

Edit: Goes way beyond shitty parenting. How did someone this stupid get a company card let alone one with a limit that high? It's disturbing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh well, looks like it's the company's problem now since it's their card. They should be more careful. Hope they have fun dealing with YT.

Anyway everyone needs to go to that kids minecraft YT channel, subscribe and hit the bell icon. Also sign up for his highest Patreon tier. Don't forget to donate to dad's legal fund.

And use your company card if you got one.

[–] amzd@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago (13 children)

Holy shit the astroturfing in this comment section is crazy. If a 9 year old went into any other store and used a company card the store would reasonably refuse to sell 100k worth of goods. If the payment system Google implemented doesn’t even verify who is paying then that’s negligence on their part.

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago

"Astroturfing" as if Lemmy is popular enough to have any of that yet

[–] chewypoops@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It was the dad who entered the card number. It was his fault. He created a Google advertising profile, but his business card on it, and then handed the reins to a child.

The biggest issue here is that dad thought he could embezzle $20 at a time, but accidentally did $120k all at once. lol. lmao even.

Lack of constant online surveillance is a good thing, btw. Expecting Google to have caught this doesn't make any sense.

[–] SirLeToet@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

The guy you're responding to has a valid point.

No way the son would get away with these actions at a physical store. "My dad was in here earlier, you saw him, i like to keep using his credit card tho, thanks"

Gee, I wonder why scamming is so huge after turning the digital market in to full "end-user responsibility" and tech companies removing carefully curated practices over the centuties for profit maximization.

Google earns billions of these scummy tactics to get users to spend as much as possible by removing any barriers of control and security. Why dont they get any of the responsibility?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Seems to me that this is a dual fail. The father should have monitored his kid more closely and not used his company card for this, but Google should have noticed the unusual spending pattern and flagged it somehow—I mean, it looks like something someone might do using a stolen card, in which case Google might never have gotten its money, if you need a self-interested reason why they should have been keeping a more careful eye on this.

[–] chewypoops@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Why would a $120k spend on a business card (entered by the cardholder on an advertising account under their name) be suspicious?

This doesn't follow the pattern of a stolen card at all.

EDIT: Dad set up the YT brand account using his employer's Google Workspace. He handed all his work emails and sensitive auth to the kid too. Dad is stupid as fuck.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›