this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2026
738 points (93.6% liked)

politics

31488 readers
2290 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 174 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (9 children)

When you choose not to decide you still have made a choice.

-Geddy Lee, Neil Peart, and Alex Lifeson

[–] Boe@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 4 weeks ago

You should change the attribution to Rush. Neil was the lyricist of the group.

[–] galacticbackhoe@lemmy.world 20 points 4 weeks ago

If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor

-Desmond Tutu

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 94 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Keep digging that hole, Ed.

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 90 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (3 children)

Isn't Netanyahu wanted for genocide?

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 71 points 4 weeks ago

Well, it's complex

[–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

Only by like 5-6 countries.

[–] Radical_Socialist_t00t@lemmy.ca 18 points 4 weeks ago

Only the countries with balls

Only the countries with a moral compass

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] abc@suppo.fi 10 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (4 children)

No, he's wanted for accusation of "the war crimes of starvation as a method of warfare and of intentionally directing an attack against the civilian population; and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts from at least 8 October 2023 until at least 20 May 2024."

https://www.icc-cpi.int/defendant/netanyahu

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rumimevlevi@sh.itjust.works 60 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Is is maintain the status quo which is Israelis exterminating Palestinians

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 57 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Listen, this genocide has a lot of nuances and moving parts and history, which means maybe it's not a situation where you can just stick your neck in and say "Killing children is wrong".

I mean, consider a corollary - the British extermination of the Irish. Yeah, it looked bad at the time. But a bunch of Irish people survived. And as a consequence, we have to put up with Ed Sheeran.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 56 points 4 weeks ago

Israel existing, and being protected from neighbors is, to my mind, a "complex political issue."

Israel performing genocide on Palestinians and annexing their homes is not.

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 54 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

"yes, I know that snipers shoot children in the head for fun, but have you considered the complex history of the region?"

[–] OnyxRex@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's not that complicated Ed. I got a pretty clear picture from an hour of research. Maybe if you get out of your algorithm for 20 minutes you might find something more tangible on the situation than a few chapters from a dusty religious text and the word of a bunch of rich assholes with vested interests in the region.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 31 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

A couple years ago it was complex. The complexity just stopped mattering once Israel turned the conflict into a war of annihilation.

[–] Nouvellalia@lemmy.world 30 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

It was always this simple at its core. What made it complex was that most people believed Israeli lies.

Right now, Israel is doing exactly what they've done since the very first day. They're just doing it faster now, and in the age of ubiquitous video coverage and information flow.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 12 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

"Complex" doesn't mean "balanced". Israel has always pulled underhanded shit like extending its de facto borders by means of "settlements". The Hamas/PLO fight also didn't happen without its involvement. But there have also been factors like the involvement of foreign powers, German guilt, the similarity between Zionism and early Nazi deportation plans, and so on.

The conflict between Israel and Palestine has been a mess from the very beginning and it's understandable that people were reluctant to get involved. Of course these days most of that complexity doesn't matter and not taking a stand is a luxury we shouldn't be able to afford.

(I'm saying "shouldn't be able to" because honestly we routinely ignore genocides; this one just happens to be particularly hard to ignore because Israel is a spotlight hog with huge diplomatic influence.)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 18 points 4 weeks ago

I get that's how it seemed if you weren't read up on it back then, and you're not to blame, but what's happening now is just a matter of extent.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 37 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (76 children)

One side is far more powerful and commiting genocide, the other is poor and simply trying to survive. Currently it is not complex at all.

My initial position after those first attacks from Hamas were Isreal has the right to defend itself, but what has happened since then is so far beyond the scope of what is acceptable, it is horrible.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

There's a deeper level to it. Israel, especially netanyahu over his long career, created the entire situation. And they did it directly and intentionally

Palestine used to be governed by the PLA. Hamas are hardliners - their founding goal was to turn the region against Israel and drive out the Israeli people. Hardliners are the least effective form of any movement

Israel held elections for Palestinians, giving them an official group to negotiate with, as well as some legal recognition that allows them to collect funds

As soon as Hamas won a single election, they stopped holding elections and the PLA leaders were assassinated soon after

Not to mention the on again off again attacks... Israel would build them infrastructure like hospitals and desalinization plants, then blow them up

There's a lot to say on the topic, so I'll end it with a fact that really puts things in contrast...

Before October 11, the average age in Gaza was under 18, and it isn't like their population numbers were booming

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (75 replies)
[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 29 points 4 weeks ago

It's no less complicated than the US using 9/11 as an excuse to intensify it's militaristic nature into a 25 year reign of terror in the middle east.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 28 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

My perception of this dude went from:

Okay maybe he likes sticking his head in the sand cause of money.

To:

He fully knows what he is doing and is complicit.

What a royal fuck up.

Also, my own two cents.

This never started as complex, and imo it’s not complex now. It is to Israel’s benefit for it to be seen as complex so they can do false equivalency.

A bully would love for observers to believe that both sides are equally in the wrong.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] flightyhobler@lemmy.world 26 points 4 weeks ago

Sounds pretty simple to me

[–] StealthLizardDrop@piefed.social 23 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

What is so complex about one side genociding the other?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 23 points 4 weeks ago

Yes, any Middle East issue is complex and unrest has been ongoing for centuries, but at least mass displacement, killing children and other innocent people, destruction and blockading of humanitarian resources, and incursion into sovreign territory should be condemned, don't you think, Ed? And the words "Free Palestine" are not anti-Israel, no one seemed to have a big problem with any of Macklemore's words, until some billionaire ten days later phoned him up about it.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 22 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

The most complex political issue on the planet remains how to handle climate change.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 15 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

You see, mass murder for imperialistic interests is a very nuanced issue and requires multiple viewpoints. There’s definitely pros and cons to it, depending on which team you’re on.

STFU and go back to making boring, gutless adult contemporary music for soccer moms.

[–] Enkrod@feddit.org 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Solving the conflict between a poor and powerless Palestine and the nuclear power of Israel IS one of the most complex political issues. Not only, but also because of the power-imbalance and generational hate on both sides.

The genocide in Gaza is decidedly NOT complex though. Yes it is a part of that entire thing, but the fact that the IDF is committing crimes against humanity is as simple as can be.

[–] VAK@lemmy.world 13 points 4 weeks ago

By conceding that the reaction to October 7 was “disproportionate”, he seemed genuinely upset. Only he didn’t say how many dead kids he would consider proportionate.

I viscerally hated that word when he said it but didn't know why until I read this article

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social 12 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Look, Ed. It's actually quite simple: A nazi state called Israel is committing a genocide in Gaza after they fabricated a terrorist attack so Bibi the nazi could declare a war and avoid prison. And a good portion of the nazi country is actually not ok with the genocide because they'd like bibi to hit them harder.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 27 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

They didn't fabricate the attack... But they did knowingly allow it to happen to get casus belli. Bibi was notified at least a week in advance that Hamas was planning something big.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 12 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Person A: You don't love me anymore?

Person B: It is complicated.

Person A: really!?

[–] deft@lemmy.wtf 11 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

My first thought when he said that.

Kids dying isn't complex bro. Like isn't he fuckin Irish?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I always try to give people the benefit of doubt. But now he's said too much for that to apply.

The entirety of Palestine, Gaza, and Israel is complex. Though, it has to be said, part of that is because Israel has done everything in their power to keep it "complex". When serious progress was being made in the early years of their nation. Their response was to assassinate the mediator. Yes. Really. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folke_Bernadotte (Oh I mean... It was totally these extremists, a rebel group, and in no way was Israel involved, they investigated themselves and found no wrongdoing!)

The Israeli genocide in Gaza however. Is not very complex. It's quite simple. It's a genocide. And they need to be held accountable. Though I wouldn't hold my breath.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 10 points 4 weeks ago

Talk about the Streisand effect

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Yah it's not complex at all it's fairly straight forward genocide.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Its patently ridiculous how hard people twist themselves into knots to try to avoid saying anything remotely negative about Israels fucking genocide.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mortn@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 weeks ago

Hey Ed, why don't you just go down and talk to a couple of Palestinians to get make it less complex?

load more comments
view more: next ›