this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2026
25 points (87.9% liked)

politics

31192 readers
2760 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Poppa_Mo@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I really fucking wish she wouldn't.

[–] myyass@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He's going to get Bernie'd.

[–] Freeposity@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Bernie fucked himself. Look, I love Bernie and have been a fan of his since the 90's but his staff choices were awful and their behavior toward people they wanted assistance from was just stupid.

I never considered Bernie skilled enough to be president, still don't. He's great at getting people fired up, but organizationally, he's a mess and I think he would have set the progressive movement back by failing spectacularly as president. Especially with a still entrenched Democratic establishment.

We have to take the party from the ground up. It's the only way.

[–] myyass@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's hard to ignore all the political candidates that came in to dilute the votes and then only to drop out. If it was a horse race, I would say it looked very fixed.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And yet he could've negotiated with Warren for one of them to drop out.

You're kind of making op's point- he's not politically savvy.

[–] myyass@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That's true, he didn't want to play ball when he could have played along and backstabbed them all if he got elected.

[–] Kayday@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Abdul is running a great race. The biggest weakness he has is that some democrat voters will (unjustly) find him "too radical."
This seems like a good move to make sure the old guard isn't scared off come election day.
This isn't Abdul endorsing Kamala, it's the other way around.

[–] yonderbarn@lazysoci.al 8 points 2 days ago

You make a good point. I just despise Kamala.

[–] Freeposity@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I love the video of Gillibrand coming out of some Democrat meeting, I think it was all senators, gritting her teeth while smiling saying, "we're going to fight hard for El Sayed".

Yeah eat it, Gillibrand. "Enough is enough."

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 21 points 2 days ago

i wish she’d sit the fuck down and shut the fuck up.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

she wants to maintain relevance, and El-Sayed probably wants to try and reach the people that thinks she's still relevant.

[–] Cherries@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, everyone can see the cynicism Kamala is trying for here. She wants a little of that progressive popularity to rub off on her to continue her political career. The silver lining here is that Kamala, representing the Establishment Democrats, sees where the wind is blowing. The Establishment Dems are realizing that they're gonna have to go leftwards of they wanna remain politically relevant, so we gotta keep pushing left while they are on the back foot.

[–] radiofreebc@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

She needs to make sure the Dems never actually get any power, and can just continue to grief the GOP as they cash in as a hapless opposition.

Trump didn't win, Hillary and Kamala LOST.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago

Exactly.... Let's find someone else! Literally anyone else. AOC doesn't want the heat? Fine, there has to be a thousand different people who are as capable and charismatic.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well its certainly a step up from when she campaigned with liz cheney but her time passed

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

From Piker to Harris, big tent energy I guess lol

For the sake of us all, I hope it pays off and Abdul knows what he's doing..

[–] Apeman42@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 1 points 2 days ago

Don't fret, comrade.