this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2026
480 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

88342 readers
3889 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

*could

won't

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 75 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Stop just fining these fuckers! They can afford any amount you fine them with. Shut down the service and charge them with crimes or gtfo.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 51 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Normally I'd agree, but if one of the more populated states fined meta at this rate it'd be a corporate death penalty

For context - New Mexico has a population of 2,124,222, making it the 36th most populated state in the country.

That's under 1% of the country. California has 39,355,309... No company currently in existence could survive a 4 trillion dollar fine

This is huge.. if it goes through

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If 43 million violations of the law aren't enough to shut something down, what is?

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fuck if I know. We can revoke a corporate charter through an act of Congress for any or no reason, we have trust busting laws that allow courts to split a company, individual states can decide to restrict or kick out a company...

We have mechanisms to do these things, but we don't really have a system of corporate criminal punishment. It's one of those problems of using an early version of democracy... Courts can fine and impose sanctions, they can prosecute individuals for their part, but as time went on instead of legislating a system of corporate punishment it's just been left to case law

Which doesn't work out well, because corporations have grown to the point they can dump more way money into legal defense than the courts can put into prosecution

So the answer to your question is basically that it doesn't matter how much they violate the law, they're to big and too powerful for the courts to handle them with the tools available

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks for the thoughtful answer, but that's all pretty depressing.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Yuuup. There's people overseas always demanding Americans take back control and stop the madness...

It's like, my brother, you have no idea what you're asking. We have so much to fix. We don't even have the mechanisms to fix the foundational problems yet. We are working on it, all of it, while also fighting like hell to avoid letting tens of millions die for easily preventable reasons

And the world's most powerful interests are fighting every single little step of the way

So, sorry to depresses you, but I do appreciate the empathy

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

As someone who's fight left them a long time ago, and it's not like I had much to begin with, I don't really blame people in America for not fighting more. Lord knows I probably wouldn't be.Those cruel fucks are just so organised, and have so much energy.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is huge.. if it goes through

Not really. This is a lawsuit about the whole Cambridge Analytica scandal back in 2016. While the penalties could technically be up to $200 Billion... they won't actually be anywhere near that high.

Back in August, they settled another multi-state lawsuit for the same stuff... for $18 Billion. And that was for settling with 48 states. New Mexico and Florida were the only two states not included in that lawsuit. There's no way in hell the punishment will be anywhere near $200 Billion for the same actions in a single state.

The only other state that could continue going after them for these actions is Florida since the other 48 states all settled.

So this issue is effectively over, and it fizzled out with a slap on the wrist as everyone expected because we don't actually punish large companies in this country.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago

This is huge.. if it goes through

Like I said, this is huge, if it goes through

$200 billion isn't a slap on the wrist, it's a real punishment. Facebook can't just cut a check and continue on, they're going to have to make hard choices if they are made to pay up. Florida alone could still drain the company dry on this case, but more importantly it sets a precedent

Since we don't have a functioning system of corporate punishment, it's all case law. I'm sure Facebook is going to fight it with everything they have, so it's not nearly over... But if this goes through anyways? That could change things

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago

it'd be a corporate death penalty

Good. Facebook should be shut down and liquidated.

Rip the fucking bandaid off.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 days ago

fuck around and find out. it might make other corporations think twice before breaking law

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 39 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I assume they will settle for 100mil and a promise to not do it again.

[–] Dindonmasker@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

100mil over 10 years and stop paying after 1 year.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 7 points 2 days ago

.... for like, at least a week.

[–] VAK@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Huh, first time I've heard a reasonably sized fine

[–] radish6367@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Hopefully they aren’t given 10 years to pay it off like the recent $18B fine for harming children.

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Could" is doing the heavy lifting.

[–] VAK@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, it's just what's legally possible and definitely won't happen

[–] SecretiveVault@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 days ago

Of which they will pay $10 in Chuck E Cheese tokens

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

please don’t settle

[–] Pomal@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The federal government has interceded and the new penalty is $1.9 million.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How much you want to bet they paid off the administration secretly for that help? There is no doubt.

[–] Pomal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

It’s a fact. They just don’t want to see it.

[–] bertlewirth@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

That’ll show them!

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

Seize their data centers in the state.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The could, and probably should, but they won't.

[–] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

People always upvote some form of this comment on every post that contains potential good news. Sometimes y'all need to keep your pessimism to your fucking self. It's exhausting.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sadly this is not pessimism but just realism. You are free to block me if that's too uncomfortable or annoying

[–] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, commenting "it won't happen" on every single fucking post is pessimism. Sometimes good things happen.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

commenting "it won't happen" on every single fucking post

But I don't do that, I can't be blamed for actions of others

[–] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If it's not you it's someone else, and it's still pessimism. And people still upvote it, because everything is bad, and all good news is actually bad news.

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you want to stick your head in the sand and hum happy tunes to yourself, give’r. We’ll be up here living in reality where, in fact, most news is bad news for the poor in America. Sorry?

[–] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You're misrepresenting reality. This article is good news, period. A jury decided Meta was at fault, and this is good regardless of your negative framing or how much they end up having to pay.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Is there a cap?

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 5 points 2 days ago

Facebook denied the claims, arguing the company has adapted its policies since the state’s lawsuit was filed in 2021 and that it removes 99% of content that violates standards. In a deposition played for jurors, CEO Mark Zuckerberg said the company had robust systems to determine whether content should be taken down.

Yes, standard violating content like ads for a play with content from Virginia Woolf. Feminism is for sure "standards violating content" in a fascist state.

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Today: Zuckerberg whispers in Trump's ear. Tomorrow: Trump announces trade tariffs on Mexico and Venezuela.

[–] biscuits@piefed.ca 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is New Mexico, a US state. Even so, Trump will prob still tariff them.

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Mate, as if he knows the difference 🤣. He'll probably rename it New America.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Today: Zuckerberg whispers in Trump's ear. Tomorrow: Trump announces trade tariffs on (New)Mexico and (says it's because Trump declared they're now part of)Venezuela.

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

And they could even pay that off in 200 easy instalments!

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Funny you mention that, oil companies at least typically pay the first payment or two on fines then stop paying and the feds let it slide. Or in shitholy states like ND they get the state courts to lower the fines to nothing after attention has died down.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

That's why all these tech guys are licking trump's cankle holders. Like calls to like.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

If the media mafia can argue like this, so can Mexico.