this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2026
86 points (98.9% liked)

politics

31271 readers
2449 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What began with a search for evidence inside a Puerto Rico voting machine grew into a vast quest involving intelligence agencies, election deniers and White House officials for proof that the 2020 vote was stolen. It failed — but Trump diehards remain undeterred.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TrackenDaKracken@lemmy.world 13 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

My hope is the people on the ground, in charge of the voting process, who work for the state, not the feds, will do their job. From what I've seen virtually all of them are dedicated to fair elections, which is why almost no fraud has been found thus far.

You can help by urging people in your circle to vote and letting them know that their employer must give them time off to vote, by law.

If you're tempted to help voters standing in long lines, say, by handing out water bottles, or letting them borrow a folding chair, you should check your state's "line warming" laws. You could contact your local officials and offer to provide such items ahead of time in a way that doesn't break the law.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

My fear is that there are PLENTY of states that would be happy to let the federal government

Polls for governor of Texas look tighter than it has ever been. It's in Abbott's best interest to let the federal government enter his state and intimidate voters in specific districts. They're poised to elect the first Democrat senator since 1988. Why not let ice into the polling centers in Austin? Why not let them handle the voting machines if they ask politely?

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago

Calling it an "obsession" makes it sound almost genuine. He's obsessed with manipulating public opinion to enable him to rig the elections.

[–] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

How did we manage to go from perfectly fair and square election to all electronic voting is rigged in the two years that he has been in power 🤔

[–] 13igtyme@startrek.website 4 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

The US has a history of rigged elections. I have it on good authority that every time a Democrat has won, the election was rigged.

[–] Pratai@piefed.ca 1 points 12 hours ago

Sort of like his obsession with Obama’s birth certificate?

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 3 points 15 hours ago

Because he installed crazy people?