this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2026
174 points (99.4% liked)

politics

31416 readers
2531 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An attorney representing protestors said this infringes on First Amendment rights.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 21 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)
[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 6 days ago

American big tech ARE the fascists.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Yes, and now they are selling localities across the USA a ready-made nationwide surveillance network that will give law enforcement a pool of guilty until proven innocent scapegoats to pin any crime on.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

true it sounds like these palantir ai's are just a collections of doxxing tools

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 6 days ago

It's what was known as "Big Data", but that phrase doesn't get them hard anymore.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 11 points 6 days ago
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I kind of assumed that protests are just a source of intel for all kinds of agencies, not just ICE.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I got paranoid in some protests I've been to. We are heavily surveiled. I think that just rallying is not effective either, I think we need to protest in more effective ways.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I assume they are getting footage, focusing on things like faces and car license plates, since at least the WTO protests. Amped up during Occupy. Also, I just assume the use of things like Stingrays to get every phone in the area. Don't really need to run video through face recognition if you can identify device(s) being carried by people that show up.

And that's not even getting into sending in agent provocateurs to make things violent to discredit an entire movement.

I'm sure if I dug through the Church Committee hearing findings on things like COINTELPRO would turn up more.

I'm cynical AF, too, and don't believe for one fucking second that COINTELPRO ever really stopped. Only the code names and technology, most likely. Hell, W's people were apparently infiltrating Quaker meetings and vegan potlucks after 9/11. It'd be nice if they were to focus their efforts on the people most likely to carry out domestic terrorism instead of vegans and Quakers - but it's likely the Republican base that end up being the suspects.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 3 points 6 days ago

The Quakers are like some of the best people in the country by character, so naturally they would be under the governmental gun.