this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
43 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37603 readers
512 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Didn't this happen like 5 months ago?

[–] Karlos_Cantana@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They'll never stop leaving.

[–] Nusm@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

They’ll never quit quitting!

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

Updated April 12, 2023

Yep

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 16 points 1 year ago

Again? Amazing. Musk can make people leave who already left.

[–] walden@sub.wetshaving.social 10 points 1 year ago

This is an old article.

[–] RobotToaster@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Don't they literally receive funding from the US government?

[–] scribblemacher@beehaw.org 25 points 1 year ago

They do, but it's a very small part of their total financing (less than 1% I think), and they don't have government appointed staff or anything like that.

[–] hoodatninja@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No more than you can say that about any organization/business that has ever received a grant or government contracts. This is a common misconception. They are not in the budget for US.

By Musk’s definition SpaceX is “funded by the state.” And far more than NPR is.

[–] EnderWi99in@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

This happened in April...

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago

🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

Click here to see the summaryIn an email to staff explaining the decision, Lansing wrote, "It would be a disservice to the serious work you all do here to continue to share it on a platform that is associating the federal charter for public media with an abandoning of editorial independence or standards."

For years, many journalists considered Twitter critical to monitoring news developments, to connect with people at major events and with authoritative sources, and to share their coverage.

PBS, which also receives money from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, and the BBC, which is funded by a uniform license fee charged to British television viewers, are among those whose Twitter accounts were given the same designation.

For example, NPR joined with other media organizations to press the Obama administration for access to closed hearings involving detainees held by U.S. authorities at Guantanamo Bay.

In his exchanges with NPR reporter Allyn, Musk said he was relying on a Wikipedia page dedicated to "publicly funded broadcasters" to determine which accounts should receive the label.

When pressed for how he justifies the disclaimer considering NPR receives meager funding from the government and has complete editorial independence, Musk veered into conspiratorial territory.


Saved 88% of original text.