What a shit of an article. The whole content would fit in 2 sentences (including title) + the website is cancerous as fuck
PC Gaming
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
That's Kotaku for you.
Without giving Kotaku the clicks, what is the jist of the article?
Account created when Runescape was 8yo, and that age used in registration causing Twitter to ban the account 15 years late as minimum age for it's users is 13yo. Now ban reverted
The title + now unbanned
if the DoB has been on the account for years (presumably) from creation, kinda odd how this pops up now.. checks like that should trigger on creation/change o_O
My guess would be somebody ran a query against the database for this and they just took action on all of the results.
I almost wonder if a disgruntled fan who's upset about the recent change of ownership (or just some recent update, knowing MMO fans) reported it to Twitter
Isn't the account literally older than 8 years?
Runescape knows a thing or two about false bans.