this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2023
126 points (98.5% liked)

Fediverse

17538 readers
4 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] quellik@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That valuation is going to drop even more once Google Cloud and AWS turn off the servers; he hasn’t been paying the hosting bills.

[–] Echolot@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago

It seems this is the „find out“ part of his plan.

[–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Tell me when it is 69% so I can say nice.

[–] Senseibull@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] netburnr@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago
[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Reddit humour migrating too uh

[–] zerkrazus@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Of course it has. It was a pump and dump scheme and he got caught with his hand in the proverbial cookie jar. He's a fucking idiot and has no clue about anything and only got where he is thanks to his dad. Fuck him.

[–] Mars@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The funny thing is, as a business, it was overvalued before the purchase and it’s overvalued right now.

The sad thing is that as a public utility it’s undervalued. But “market forces” place value in pretty stupid things (useless speculative assets) and not in essential ones (open source packages that hold the internet together)

That’s why I have high hopes for open source, standards based, interoperable, federated social media. The people need to have public places. People on the internet need to have public places. No private monopoly can be the owner of the “town square”

[–] rglullis 1 points 1 year ago

There never was a "single" town square to begin with, so I don't really understand when people talk about a "monopoly" here.

[–] fomo_erotic@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Such a weird concept to think of when it comes to something like Twitter.

I don't think twitters value was ever reflected in a share price. It's value was always to move and away opinions, which is far more difficult to put a value on. I know there is plenty of whining happening on Twitter, but as far as I can tell, there hasn't been a truly mass exodus. As long as users are using the platform it's value remains unchanged.

The saudis didn't buy it because they think Elon is reapply smart. they bought it because in some way they think it gives them the ability to leverage or move public opinion. As long as we give it out eyes, it stays valuable.

[–] laxe@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Even if there isn’t a user exodus, the value can change if advertisers value the platform less and spend less on it.

While twitter is trying to make subscriptions a thing, the main revenue source is advertising so the value reflects the advertising potential.

[–] mook@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] MayorMcCheese@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Twitter was always boring….

[–] vhstape@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Not just boring, but self-important and toxic… The culture of that site was a disaster even before Elon got his grubby hands on it

[–] jeff@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Color me surprised!

[–] Jarmer@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

wait, you're telling me bringing the sink into work didn't magically save the company? Noooooooo

[–] doczhivago007@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago
[–] ImOnADiet@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›