this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
18 points (90.9% liked)

CanadaPolitics

2840 readers
6 users here now

Placeholder for any r/CanadaPolitics refugees

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre will introduce a non-confidence motion Wednesday designed to topple the government and trigger a federal election — a parliamentary manoeuvre that's likely to fail."

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kbal@fedia.io 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not really, though. His main purpose is to keep both the carbon tax and his own name in the headlines, so I guess he succeeded.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

It will also let him say his party voted to axe the tax, while the NDP, Liberals, and Bloc either vote for it, or abstain. It's a purity test the other MPs are designed to fail.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"We'll get rid of this tax!"

"Won't that mean less money in the pockets of the majority, making things worse for them?"

"😡"

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not if they cut funding to things like healthcare, infrastructure, science, education, etc. and give more money to corporations who donate to their political party.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

We're talking about the carbon tax, what's collected in your province (except for BC and Quebec) is redistributed directly to the people in the province based on their household situation (with or without spouse, with or without child...), it doesn't affect the government's coffers and a small minority gets less than they pay.