this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
225 points (98.3% liked)

News

23361 readers
3241 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Judge Arthur Engoron said he wants the company to inform the court-appointed monitor in advance of "any efforts" to get a bond.

The judge who handed down a $464 million judgment against Donald Trump, his company and co-defendants in a civil fraud case has ordered the Trump Organization to keep the court closely informed about any efforts to secure a bond ahead of Monday’s deadline.

New York state Judge Arthur Engoron said Thursday that Trump's company needs to provide details to a court-appointed monitorabout attempts to obtain a bond that would stop authorities from collecting on the judgment while it appeals last month's ruling. The monitor, former federal Judge Barbara Jones, is to report regularly to Engoron.

"The Trump Organization shall inform the Monitor, in advance, of any efforts to secure surety bonds," Engoron said in his order, as well as "any personal guarantees made by any of the Defendants," which would include the former president.

The order — part of a larger ruling detailing and expanding the monitor's duties — comes days before the deadline for Trump and his co-defendants to secure a bond that would stop New York Attorney General Letitia James' office from being able to collect on the judgment while they appeal Engoron's ruling.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 62 points 8 months ago (2 children)

How dare they assume Trump will commit fraud, simply because he's been found guilty of fraud!!

[–] RedWeasel@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Fraud by itself may be enough to disqualify him from office.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 29 points 8 months ago

It's insane that Trump could survive any of the things he said in 2016. The same people who thought Obama wearing a tan suit was horrible were fine with the pussy grabber.

[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

While I agree that should be the case, what makes you think it will be? The Supreme Court just ruled the Constitution doesn't matter.

[–] RedWeasel@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Yeah, you have a point. I was thinking about requirements for impeachment which is related to removal from being in office. I think the SC majority got theirs wrong and the minority is right. But they don't want to be part of judgements, ie their job, at least part of the time.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

No one in the history of this country has been more unfairly persecuted!

[–] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

No one will give him the $500 milion he needs, he even put up a 5 acer lot on the edge of Mara Lago, valued at $34 trillion as collateral.

[–] YaDownWitCPP@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

So generous; who could possibly scoff at a deal like that‽

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What happens if Trump simply disregards the monitor, and posts bond?

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The monitor isn't preventing him from posting bond, they are simply saying if he somehow comes up with bond he must immediately inform the monitor so they don't accidentally start liquidating his properties.

As I understand it, Trumps business shenanigans are so sketch that they wanted this monitor to make sure he isn't shuffling around money to game collection.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Again, my question stands, what if he ignores the monitor and posts bond? What’s preventing him from just doing what he wants?

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Nothing. Up until Monday that is explicitly an option for him, and what the courts probably expected to happen.

After Monday it's too late.

I think what they are afraid of is that he secures a bond and then doesn't properly notify anyone. So then they liquidate his assets and he goes "Whoa I have bond! Look at what you just did to me! So illegal, no other person has been treated so unfairly by the courts!"... I think that's the scenario they are trying to avoid.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I call doubt that they will seize his stuff. Watch he get some kind of extension. Swear they going let him continue to break the law and face no judgment until after November.

Now if we can keep in out of the Whitehouse then maybe just maybe he can go to jail then.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I too am pessimistic. I am not a lawyer, but every legal analysis I have read paints this situation as pretty bad for him financially. Maybe he gets bond before they start liquidating, but from everything I read he is extremely unlikely to win out in the appeal process. Best likely outcome from him is Putin somehow gives him a half billion dollar loan and it doesn't somehow run afoul of sanction and finance law. Or it does run afoul, but it's a criminal thing and he has been able to dodge criminal cases like Neo from the Matrix.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I am confused on what she is monitoring then if any of this was allowed.