this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
136 points (95.3% liked)

Privacy

31981 readers
323 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kryllic@programming.dev 44 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The unsealed court order wasn’t just fishing for a list of vague identifiers that could be winnowed down to a list of suspects and a follow-up warrant demanding actual identifying information on these ~30,000 YouTube users. No, it appears the feds led with the big ask, demanding names, addresses, phone numbers, and user activity for every viewer of these videos between January 1-8, 2023. AND(!!) it asked Google to provide IP addresses for all viewers who were not logged into (or did not possess) Google accounts.

That's fucked

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

programming-communism When you watch BreadTube you’re streaming communism.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You joke, but I don't see why Google wouldn't just hand over browsing data regarding various topics they already consider demonetizable.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 27 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Here's a genius tip to the Google developers: you don't have to turn over the data you don't have.

[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 months ago

Google priorities: Ad revenue >>>>>> "don't be evil"

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 26 points 7 months ago

What's worse is that a person could become a suspect just by turning on autoplay

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm less worried about this scenario: "We are investigating one specific person whom we have probable cause to believe committed a specific crime. Oh look, he has a Gmail account. Let's subpoena his video searches with a valid warrant."

I'm extremely troubled by this scenario: "We don't like people who search for videos on guns/surfing/cats/whatever. Let's subpoena a list of those people and start investigating them on no other basis."

[–] xor@infosec.pub 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

"We don't like people who search for videos on civil rights/racial equality/social justice/anarchism/communism/anti-capitalism/fbi overreach. Let's subpoena a list of those people and start investigating them on no other basis."

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 5 points 7 months ago

laughs in geheime staatspolizei

[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

The public needs to create "where do cops live ?" and "what is each cop's collective record on abuse and arrests ?" type databases.

They need to be held to a higher standard that has us surveil them, too.

Watch them; follow them; write it all down.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I've been thinking about a network of private license plate reading cameras that only keep track of known cop license plates.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 months ago

That would be interesting. Just make sure that the criminals aren't watching them in real time.

[–] Scolding0513@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago

THIS but expand it to people that work in federal agencies like FBI CIA NSA. there should be a decentralized database tracking all their personal info and their history