this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
26 points (100.0% liked)

Space

7286 readers
57 users here now

News and findings about our cosmos.


Subcommunity of Science


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] weew@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

If there's life on that planet, they gonna have a hard time making it to orbit

I actually wonder what's the biggest (rocky) planet that is actually possible to launch a chemical rocket from. At some point you just can't get enough thrust to weight, right? They'd have to resort to exotic stuff like nuclear fission engines.

[–] min_fapper@iusearchlinux.fyi 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sounds like a question to email Randall Monroe about.

[–] Sierra_Is_Bee@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not an engineer or anything, but perhaps you could get a space elevator high enough to reach escape velocity more easily. Then again, it would have to be very tall I'm sure... Never mind probably not feasible.

[–] zhunk@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For a geostationary orbit, which is where the center of mass of a space elevator would be:

h = ³√ G * m * T² / ( 4 * π² ) - r

  • h: orbit height (m)
  • G: gravitational constant
  • m: mass of celestial body (kg)
  • T: period of rotation (s)
  • r: radius of celestial body (m)

So, if the mass goes way up, the height of the orbit will, too, unless something crazy happens like the planet spinning super fast.

[–] Idrunkenlysignedup@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I'm not a smart person, but my calculator says that a 200lb person would weigh 4 tons so I'm not totally sure there could even be multicellular life on that planet. Plus any atmosphere would probably be quite thicc

load more comments
view more: next ›