this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
73 points (96.2% liked)

Risa

6910 readers
44 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 37 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well, it's been a long road getting from there to here...

[–] Chuymatt@beehaw.org 3 points 7 months ago
[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 18 points 7 months ago

Not if you've got faith of the heart

[–] Milksteaks@midwest.social 13 points 7 months ago

They're just going where their hearts taking them, after all they can do anything

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 4 points 7 months ago
[–] invertedspear@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Historical ships named Enterprise. There are really only the two in your pic if your timeline doesn’t have a Star Trek show, which is weirdly paradoxical considering the shuttle was named after the TV show. So in the Star Trek timeline I guess the shuttle is named after the sailing ship for some reason.

[–] Jaccident@startrek.website 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

That’s a half-myth it seems. There was a write in campaign from the fans to rename the then tentatively named Constitution (in recognition of the 200th anniversary of the ratification of the US Declaration of Independence), to Enterprise. At the same time, Gerald Ford had the final say, and he himself served aboard the famous WW2 aircraft carrier, the USS Enterprise (CV-6). It would appear that there is a confluence of two wishes to lead to the test vehicle being finally officially named the Enterprise. Certainly of recent years, NASA has seemed happy to not dispel that story though.

Some interesting tid-bits here though. The NCC-1701 was early on going to be named the USS Yorktown. Yorktown-class was the ship class of the CV-6 Enterprise. While we all know that the ship class of the NCC-1701 was the Constitution-class.

So, it’s my belief therefore that, in our timeline and Star Trek’s timeline, American men of a certain age seem to be obsessed with the symbolism of three particular names; and no matter what, the Shuttle would have been Enterprise in both.

[–] invertedspear@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

ROFL, upvote cause the good info on Enterprise, but OP said Discovery. My head was stuck on Enterprise for some reason. Probably so many comments with the theme song to Enterprise.

We really do go from the age of sailing to the shuttle with the Discovery name

[–] Jaccident@startrek.website 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah, I couldn’t tell if there was some joke I wasn’t getting, but the “naming paradox” comes up a lot (and I too believed it for years) so I thought I’d add some colour anyway.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

So when was this? The Enterprise montage includes one of the aircraft carriers, IIRC.

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

That’s why they made the Burn happen, to turn back the clock halfway back tech wise.

[–] autonomous@startrek.website 1 points 4 months ago

Exec 1: "How do we get away with wiping the board completely clean so we can do whatever we want? We can't afford writers." Exec 2: "Burn It"