this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
247 points (97.3% liked)

Privacy

44584 readers
204 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Here's a link to the news. https://e621.net/news_updates

Edit: As people in the comments pointed out, this bill targets all websites hosting porn. e621 just happens to be hosted in Arizona, and it therefore affects them directly.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] barbara@lemmy.ml 68 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

This is not a witch hunt against that site. It's probably the only site residing in arizona that cares and which you visit. They could easily relocate, which they probably do if the bill is passed.

[–] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 36 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My bet is that it is a law against porn, and furry porn would be inside that

[–] Sabata11792@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They just outlawed 99% of the internet?

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's not outlawing. It's inlawing.

Wait. That's something different. It's regulating.

No wait, that's something different too. It's "but think of the children!!!"

[–] Sabata11792@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

inlawing

Feel bad for the Arazona guys that don't get to witness the newest porn fad.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 64 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I have no idea how government regulation of the Internet has become so normalized.

https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

oh, no, not the furries! but honestly:

FIRST THEY CAME FOR THE FURRIES AND I DID NOT SPRAK OUT

I mean, laws like this don't just effect furries. It's a privacy issue for everyone in the state, and everyone who who usesa website based out of the state.

[–] ji59@kbin.social 27 points 2 years ago (3 children)

...PUBLISHES OR DISTRIBUTES MATERIAL HARMFUL TO MINORS ON THE INTERNET FROM A WEBSITE THAT CONTAINS A SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF MATERIAL HARMFUL TO MINORS...
Since furry porn isn't harmful, they should be ok.

[–] blujan@sopuli.xyz 40 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I don't know the site that much, but I know that "harmful to minors" can mean anything.

[–] FilterItOut@thelemmy.club 10 points 2 years ago

Think of the children!

I'll believe they're thinking of the children when they use that phrase to make laws that agree with the environmental groups and governing bodies.

[–] Dirk_Darkly@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, like it could mean they'll become furries.

[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

How much is a "substantial amount"? There's not thaaat much porn on e621, most of it is marked safe
Well a lot of it is...
Well some of it is...
I'm relatively sure i saw one marked safe once...

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure that viewing pornography can be harmful to young children.

Not all "minors", but some people forget that the phrase includes both 17 year olds and 4 year olds in some states...

[–] Gabu@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 years ago

At this point, I honestly expected it to have been moved to some European country... I mean, what site? Never heard of it.

[–] neutron@thelemmy.club 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I assume there are more issues preventing them from simply relocating to another hosting?

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago

I don't think that matters if they have a business nexus presence in that state. Like if (most of) the developer(s) working on it are in the state they could be subject to the law.

[–] Scolding0513@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 years ago

WHY CANT I JUST GOON TO PICS OF KRYSTAL FROM STAR FOX IN PEACE

[–] Titou@feddit.de 10 points 2 years ago

Why not moving the website on another country/continement ? Or even better federating it

[–] AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The politicians in Arizona

Which ones? The republican minority?

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 2 years ago

Hi. That is incorrect. Sorry.