this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
299 points (98.7% liked)

Linux

48031 readers
1225 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ByroTriz@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

open source hardware has a lot of potential

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Especially when home manufacturing becomes more of a thing.

[–] ByroTriz@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I mean home manufacturing is cool and all, but in the short term open source hardware has the potential to create a lot more competition in traditional manufacturing. Most big tech rely on IP nowadays, without it there would be more competitors to drive prices down and increase supply. Home manufacturing is more in the far future IMO

[–] lengsel@latte.isnot.coffee 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Test it with OpenBSD and with a Linux-libre distribution to verify how open the hardware is.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The GPU and WiFi drivers are going to be the major limitations here. All GPU and WiFi vendors now require proprietary blobs in order to function.

[–] lengsel@latte.isnot.coffee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No. OpenBSD develops their own drivers fot Intel iGPU l, 2.5Gb ethernet, and wi-fi. They don't have.license to include them in base, they download the firmware after first reboot if there's a basic ethernet connection.

The source code is publicly available from OpenBSD firmware folder on server, but cannot be included in the base installation.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I've only used Linux-libre when it comes to fully free systems. There is no option to download proprietary firmwares on a GNU/Linux-libre distro.

Are the firmwares distributed as blobs, or as source-available (proprietary-licensed) code?

[–] lengsel@latte.isnot.coffee 1 points 1 year ago

For OpenBSD firmware? They are not blobs but are binary installs as there is no such thing as a source installation, everything has to be compiled and build before it can be installed.

I believe OpenBSD firmware has an ISC license attached to them, but since OpenBSD developers develop the firmware, they don't have legal license from Intel to distribute in base, but I'm pretty sure that OpenBSD firmware has an ISC license for freedom.

[–] shirro@aussie.zone 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I have been watching system76 from afar for a long time and everytime I upgrade I look at their systems but I was never confident of local support. I bought an equivalent to one of their early laptops from a local company once. I think it is great that they are bringing more design in-house as rebadging generic systems limited their documentation and repairability.

While competition is good I can't look past Framework at the moment. They shipped to me direct from Taiwan as fast as a local delivery and I know I can repair the system so it removes all the concerns I had about dealing with a niche foreign company. I see no value in PopOS or the other user space stuff from system76. Open firmware is an advantage but I think framework will get there eventually. As much as I respect system76s mission I think their business model is dubious. They should have gone in-house open hardware earlier and I think the userspace stuff is a pointless distraction.

[–] Nuuskis9@feddit.nl 9 points 1 year ago

That's your opinion and that's fine. For me, open hardware + hot swappable mechanical keyboard + trackpoint + designed to be repaired + the general opennes are the reasons why Virgo comes to my desk.

Framework is good for many and thanks to LTT will sell more units but I've been only with Thinkpads since 2008 so Coreboot + trackpoint are must-haves for me.

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Framework 3:2 screen is a dealbreaker for me though... I'm not a coder so it doesnt benefit me at all

[–] twei@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

believe me: once you have it, you won't go back. that extra height also gives the laptop more space for a bigger touchpad, which is also great.

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have tiny hands. Never thought about needing a bigger touchpad

that gba emulation though...

[–] shirro@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I respect that. I do code occasionally and I was only interested in 16:10 or squarer for a laptop. I was very concerned about the high dpi but it has been fine for me.

Ideally I wanted a 14" 16:10 (ideally 1920x1200 so I didn't need fractional scaling) with a high refresh rate and integrated amd graphics but the expandability and ability to maintain the system myself in a fairly remote area sold me on the compromise and I don't regret it but it wasn't my ideal laptop.

Expanding a custom product line is very expensive and will take time compared with slapping a badge on generic machines. The 16" framework with 16:10 aspect and 165hz refresh is going to expand Framwork's customer base a lot but my ideal is a system that falls in-between the two.

Without an equivalent to the Framework marketplace or a local presence I don't see myself ever buying a system76 despite looking at them regularly since they started. I bought an ASUS z35fm in 2007 based on what I think was their Darter at the time. They had 16 years to convert me to a sale and it took Framework a year with a better business model.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

EDIT: I'm like 90% sure I'm remembering Purism here, not System 76.

I want them to succeed (and open source hardware in general), but I got burnt by one of their early ones. A complete lemon of a laptop. I've had better build quality out of Acer.

I was pleasantly surprised by my OG Framework DIY laptop though. They're doing great work.

[–] surfrock66@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I agree, I had a darter that was garbage...but both my wild dog and thelio have been spectacular, and I trust their hardware and PCB dev absed on success in the thelio custom PCBs and launch keyboard. I think judging them by their clevo rebrand isn't as valid as judging them by the launch and the thelio. If I needed a laptop, I'd strongly consider this

[–] surfrock66@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I agree, I had a darter that was garbage...but both my wild dog and thelio have been spectacular, and I trust their hardware and PCB dev absed on success in the thelio custom PCBs and launch keyboard. I think judging them by their clevo rebrand isn't as valid as judging them by the launch and the thelio. If I needed a laptop, I'd strongly consider this

[–] Marxine@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's based. I might give PopOS a try when their new DE reaches feature completion (since they don't sell their laptops in my country unfortunately)

[–] meteotsunami@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Pop is my new go to distro. Even without their own DE, the tweaks to gnome are really well considered and I don't spend an hour unfucking the default environment.

[–] neardeaf@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I distro hopped forever until I finally landed on pop, staying on it for a long time before thinking about switching

[–] SymbolicLink@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I was on Pop for a while, if I was still using an Nvidia card I would still be on Pop. Their built in support/installer is just so convenient and seamless for the most part.

Nvidia is just such a pain on Linux. Like if it works then great, but I have had just so many minor problems in the past.

My Nvidia card is essentially just a backup now in my server in case I need video output for a terminal.

[–] gfom@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Fingers crossed they'll open that EU warehouse sooner rather then later. And they'll sell more then their keyboards from it (I've been looking forward to at least those with affordable shipping for ages)

load more comments
view more: next ›