this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
173 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy Guides

16556 readers
54 users here now

In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.

This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.


You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Learn more...


Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We've tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!

Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!


This community is the "official" Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other "Privacy Guides" communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.


Moderation Rules:

  1. We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
  2. This is not the place for self-promotion if you are not listed on privacyguides.org. If you want to be listed, make a suggestion on our forum first.
  3. No soliciting engagement: Don't ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
  4. Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
  5. Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
  6. Don't repost topics which have already been covered here.
  7. News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
  8. Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
  9. No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don't abuse our community's willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
  10. No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
  11. Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
  12. General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.

Additional Resources:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

What do you guys think about this glasses to use daily to escape Facial Recognition? Worth the price? Does it really work?

https://reflectacles.com

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] prenatal_confusion@lemmy.one 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is also how we stop our biggest abusers of our service. They leave such a unique fingerprint from all our other customers, we just quietly shadowban them.

[–] johnyrocket@feddit.ch 2 points 1 year ago

What service, if I may ask, is it that you run?

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 49 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I prefer dazzle paint. It looks way more badass.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It doesn’t need to be as dramatic as this. The goal is simply to obscure key parts of the face that are commonly used for individualization. Between the eyebrows, the bridge of the nose, jawline, eye tilt, etc are all common key data points that facial recognition systems use to differentiate between similar faces. You can also try to avoid facial detection from pinging you in the first place, by obscuring the expected oval head shape. Style your hair asymmetrically, have bangs that droop over one eye, break up the expected round shape, use a color that mismatches your skintone, etc…

Your face paint is definitely an extreme example of the latter. But the important part is that some may actually still be able to detect a face (even if it can’t positively identify them) because they didn’t do anything to obscure the head shape or obscure at least one of their eyes.

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But I want it to be as dramatic as this.

[–] stoicmaverick@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 year ago

Oh god, it's my ex too.

[–] donslaught@unilem.org 3 points 1 year ago

So to defeat facial recognition all I need is a Flock of Seagulls haircut?

[–] KrisND@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

And that's how I got kicked out of the local trader joes...

[–] lud@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

In what direction are you moving in? I can't tell!

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 24 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I doubt they work, and they're definitely not worth the price imo

I can get a pair of prescription sunglasses for less than that

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] handygaber@lemmy.one 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This seems more like an art project than a functional product. Highly doubt it'll work

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] chairman@feddit.nl 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I suppose putting on a very unique pair of glasses would for sure avoid facial recognition. Why would there be a need to recognize your face if u make yourself so obviously different vs others. Haha.

A dumbass camera would be sufficient. No need for complicated facial recognition camera.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's not how they work. They're highly reflective, so they block analog cameras, and they're infrared blocking, so they stop auto focus.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] learningduck@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But if majority wear this to prevent facial recognition, they won't be standing out anymore.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] baatliwala@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Put your grasses on, nothing will be wrong...

So this is what my homies mean when they say "bro this is too far, you need to touch grass"

[–] Zoift@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I read somewhere that during covid there was a big shift in recognition techniques to overall facial morphology & gait recognition.

I'll try & find an article. Mask up & keep a coin in your shoe.

[–] gnygnygny@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] SoBoredAtWork@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Okay. Who's doing the PDF deep dive and letting us know how this works in TL;DR format?

[–] exponential_wizard@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

You take the image recognization machine, and you run the output of your own algorithm through it, training your algorithm to value patterns that confuse the first machine.

I wouldn't trust this to work against updated machine learning algorithms.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ElRenosaurusReg@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only thing they block is the eyes, nothing is obscured otherwise, their own demos on their website show that.

I personally won't be wasting my money, if I want to obscure my face I'll wear a face mask and color contacts like I already do.

[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

but if we combine the glasses with a mask maybe we have a good approach, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Worth the price is subjective. Are you a wanted criminal, or planning a heist? Then probably yes. Otherwise, probably no.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or maybe attending a protest in China?

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

I would definitely want something more than these glasses in that case, but that's another possible use for them for sure.

[–] newIdentity@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maybe you just want to look sick at the next rave.

Not their intended purpose, but that's the only one that doesn't sound stupid

Edit: looking at their website, that might be their intended target audience.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] soviettaters@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] smeg@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

Lol what? The met aren't even representative of policing in the UK, let alone the rest of Europe!

[–] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Any sources to back up that a vague amount of infrared of the eye region is so meaningfully essential to face recognition systems? My sunglasses reflect most visible light, and they reflect some infrared light, and they cost $5. Even granting that very shaky claim, infrared blocking materials aren't that expensive, this seems like a gimmick to make up for big prices.

A mask and any sunglasses or hat will prevent facial recognition 1000x better I suspect.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Groggio@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
[–] ChiefSinner@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wonder, could you get them with prescription lenses or would it defeat the purpose of the glasses?

[–] Quereller@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

I am always reminded on the scramble suit from a Scanner Darkly.

[–] Gush@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Mate they're ugly as hell, i won't buy that shit

[–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Are these not just glasses blocking IR? I didn't look too much into them, but looking at the lenses. Looks like IR blocking lenses.

load more comments
view more: next ›