I feel this way when people reference decades like, "it was acceptable in the 80's".
If anything, the apostrophe should be in front to denote the year being truncated: '80s
I feel this way when people reference decades like, "it was acceptable in the 80's".
If anything, the apostrophe should be in front to denote the year being truncated: '80s
I am firmly in thread-OP's boat and wanted to disagree with you, but I searched my email/sms comment history to find examples of when I used "i.e." (to refute you) and you're right: I could have been more concise in every single instance.
I often used "i.e." to essentially repeat myself.. to "drive the point home", much like I'm doing right now.
It's something I actually hate about myself, that I ramble on and on when I've already made my point. Sorry to everyone that read this entire comment.. I promise I'm working on it.
Meowzer'); DROP TABLE Cats;--
That's so awful 💔
Makes total sense!
So the answer is "no" in this case?
Less bulky wearable technology, I hope.
I really like my dumb watch and have yet to find a wearable -- that isn't a watch -- that isn't clumsy or bulky
Oop.. I didn't mean to reply to your comment. I'll stealth-edit/delete. Sorry!
Ooooooh, mine is pronouncing onion as ungyin