AnneBonny

joined 2 years ago
[–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

Harvard received the first plagiarism complaint in October. The investigation of the claims in that complaint came to its conclusion on December 9. Harvard said they supported her as recently as December 12.

Harvard University announced Tuesday that under-fire President Claudine Gay will keep her job — even after reportedly losing more than $1 billion in donations since her disastrous congressional testimony about antisemitism.

The Harvard Corporation — the university’s highest governing body — made its announcement Tuesday following night-long talks between Gay and university leaders, a source familiar with the decision told the student newspaper, the Harvard Crimson.

"As members of the Harvard Corporation, we today reaffirm our support for President Gay’s continued leadership of Harvard University. Our extensive deliberations affirm our confidence that President Gay is the right leader to help our community heal and to address the very serious societal issues we are facing,” the group said in a statement.

https://nypost.com/2023/12/12/news/harvard-expected-to-announce-claudine-gay-will-keep-job/

The Harvard Corporation expressed concerns about allegations of plagiarism in University President Claudine Gay’s academic work Tuesday morning, even as the board declared its unanimous support for Harvard’s embattled president, providing Gay with a path forward to remain in office.

“As members of the Harvard Corporation, we today reaffirm our support for President Gay’s continued leadership of Harvard University,” the board wrote in a University-wide statement on Tuesday. “In this tumultuous and difficult time, we unanimously stand in support of President Gay.” ... While the Corporation said it did not believe that the allegations amount to misconduct, it announced that Gay agreed to amend two publications.

“On December 9, the Fellows reviewed the results, which revealed a few instances of inadequate citation,” the Fellows wrote. “While the analysis found no violation of Harvard’s standards for research misconduct, President Gay is proactively requesting four corrections in two articles to insert citations and quotation marks that were omitted from the original publications.”

https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2023/12/12/corporation-raises-plagiarism-concerns/

That said, two additional complaints were submitted in December. One complaint was submitted on December 18 and the other was on December 29. I think the last one just happened to be the straw that broke the camel's back.

https://freebeacon.com/campus/fresh-allegations-of-plagiarism-unearthed-in-official-academic-complaint-against-claudine-gay/

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/02/us/harvard-claudine-gay-plagiarism.html

[–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

I haven't the faintest idea about that.

[–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

Government agencies tend to treat larger corporations with more deference, and that needs to stop. The standards are plenty strict, but they aren't enforced strictly and equally.

[–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 years ago

As opposed to everyone else who is ignoring that part.

There is nuance, but people are saying things like "the pope created another kind of marriage."

https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueChristian/s/kvmnhqwwZ9

[–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago

They should just succeed and become a desert version of North korea.

Do you mean secede?

[–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I'm not sure whether that would be a feasible solution. The undocumented part of "undocumented immgrant" is a result of immigrants bypassing a similar system when entering the country.

[–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Most of the ghouls involved with these AI companies to a one are effective altruists. Who would gladly see millions suffer and die. If they thought it would mean that they and the people they chose would get to go on and colonize space and other worlds etc.


I don't understand what you're saying here given that wikipedia describes effective altruism as:

Effective altruism (often abbreviated EA) is a 21st-century philosophical and social movement that advocates "using evidence and reason to figure out how to benefit others as much as possible, and taking action on that basis".[1][2] People who pursue the goals of effective altruism, sometimes called effective altruists,[3] may choose careers based on the amount of good that they expect the career to achieve or donate to charities based on the goal of maximising positive impact. They may work on the prioritization of scientific projects, entrepreneurial ventures, and policy initiatives estimated to save the most lives or reduce the most suffering.[4]: 179–195 

Effective altruists aim to emphasize impartiality and the global equal consideration of interests when choosing beneficiaries. Popular cause priorities within effective altruism include global health and development, social inequality, animal welfare, and risks to the survival of humanity over the long-term future.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effective_altruism

[–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

Thank you. I'm reading the article, but I'm trying to get oriented. I've never heard of this before.

[–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Who is e/acc?

[–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You Say I “might have exhibited millions of Plebians, sacrificed to the pride Folly and Ambition of Monarchy and Aristocracy.” This is very true. And I might hav[, Start insertion,e, End,] exhibited as many millions of Plebians sacrificed by the Pride Folly and Ambition of their fellow Plebians and their own, in proportion to the extent and duration of their power. Remember Democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes exhausts and murders itself. There never was a Democracy Yet, that did not commit suicide. It is in vain to Say that Democracy is less vain, less proud, less selfish, less ambitious or less avaricious than Aristocracy or Monarchy. It is not true in Fact and no where appears in history. Those Passions are the same in all Men under all forms of Simple Government, and when unchecked, produce the same Effects of Fraud Violence and Cruelty. When clear Prospects are opened before Vanity, Pride, Avarice or Ambition, for their easy gratification, it is hard for the most considerate Phylosophers and the most conscientious Moralists to resist the temptation. Individuals have conquered themselves, Nations and large Bodies of Men, never.

https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Adams/99-02-02-6371

[–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Slowpoke image: did you guys hear about reddit

view more: ‹ prev next ›