BackStabbath

joined 1 year ago
[–] BackStabbath@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah it's good assuming it's cheap. In the US, it's quite a bit more and I don't think I'd pay that much. These big companies know that charging that kind of money in India will get them nowhere and so even Spotify and Apple Music are super cheap.

[–] BackStabbath@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I pay for it, but it's insanely cheap in my country. Family plan is like $1.5 a month lol. 5 or 6 users for that convenience is worth it in my eyes. I'd rather do that than make my parents, grandparents have to worry about ad blockers on all their devices.

[–] BackStabbath@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

But not everyone does right? I feel like you have to be a fairly big/popular channel to have sponsors. I'm pretty sure smaller channels can only depend on ad revenue.

[–] BackStabbath@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Not the best take. The apps still need to continue to be developed, adding new features and improvements along the way. That's the cost of development. Not everything is just the cost of infrastructure. By that logic, McDonald's workers shouldn't be paid because it's not their buns and patties, etc.

[–] BackStabbath@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I switch between 60Hz and 120Hz pretty often. And while I do notice a huge difference, it's not for long and I get used to it.

[–] BackStabbath@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Huh, it works just fine for me. I have Samsung galaxy buds 2 pro. I don't use it with my laptop often, but it's seamless when I do.

[–] BackStabbath@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

That would definitely be disappointing