this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
83 points (93.7% liked)

Android

17407 readers
259 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Just got a new phone (OnePlus Nord 3), turned refresh rate HUD in developer settings and I see some parts of the system and some apps display 120 Hz but I have problem noticing any difference, same with my wife's Redmi Note 12, i have to look very carefully and maaaybe I notice some different, not sure

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nottheengineer@feddit.de 38 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You're blessed, I can't use a 60hz phone anymore after having one with 90hz.

If you don't think high refresh rate makes a difference, turn it to 60hz to save some battery and to not get used to it and end up with the same problem as me.

Just changed my phone to 160hz. I can't believe i used to live like a poor

[–] BackStabbath@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I switch between 60Hz and 120Hz pretty often. And while I do notice a huge difference, it's not for long and I get used to it.

[–] dandroid@dandroid.app 2 points 1 year ago

I was just playing with my wife's phone the other day. She has the pixel 6a, and I have the pixel 7. So they are extremely similar looking and feeling phones, except hers has a 60Hz screen and mine has a 90Hz screen. I thought the phone was broken. I was like, "why is the screen so choppy???"

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Nah, some people just notice it more, some less. I always upset my friends when they show me their 165Hz monitors or their 4k screens and I'm like "Oh is it? I wouldn't have noticed." 🀷 Happens. In return I always notice immediately if an icon is badly or lazily made.

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It wouldn't surprise me if some of them didn't actually set their monitor to 165 or whatever the highest might be. So many people talked about this back on r/pcmasterrace

[–] Boinketh@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I use a high refresh rate monitor and 60hz feels SO SLOW to me. I can't stand it.

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh yeah, once you're used to it, it's hard to be satisfied with less

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly it's one of those things that aren't all that impressive at first glance, but if you use it for a while THEN go back to 60hz it hurts

[–] henfredemars@lemdro.id 4 points 1 year ago

Precisely this. I didn't notice it much when I started using it, but I switch between phones frequently for software development, and I definitely feel the difference. It's nice, but it's not a life-changing difference. It's just a difference.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you're not seeing it, you're not paying attention to the right things. I'm never going back to anything below 120.

[–] NightOwl@lemmy.one 11 points 1 year ago

Especially scrolling. It's really noticeable for those gestures which is pretty frequent on phones.

[–] happyhippo@feddit.it 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Had to scroll way too much to find this comment.

Seriously people, just try to scroll your app drawer after turning off 120Hz. It's jitter as far as the eye can see.

[–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah scrolling is where the difference really shows. Seems about what you'd want to optimize a smartphone for

[–] YonatanAvhar@programming.dev 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can easily tell when a phone is at 120Hz, but the difference in actual use is minor, and I keep it on 60Hz to conserver battery

load more comments (1 replies)

You'll only really notice it when things are moving and only when it's about 60+ frames per second. Otherwise, your display is just refreshing static objects more frequently. It will not have anything to do with quality of images. You might notice an increase in responsiveness since the screen refreshed sooner, but that is generally minimal.

[–] NENathaniel@lemmy.film 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The difference is massive to me but my parents struggle to notice, so it certainly varies person to person

[–] maniel@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm starting to worry it's an age thing, I'm near 40😝

[–] rammer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

It's all downhill from about 25.

You'll start to notice it by 40-50.

Generally it is a slow, gentle downhill but it varies from person to person.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bandario@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a massive difference in smoothness between 60 and 120hz for me, even just scrolling you can tell straight away how deliciously smooth 120 is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] r00ty@kbin.life 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think in most cases it won't matter, and many people cannot perceive the difference.

But from my own experience I did the csgo sniper test map (where you look down to the doors and shoot the random npc players that will jump across).

While I didn't think it felt different I could consistently hit at more than twice the rate on 144hz vs 60.

After using 144hz for a while there is a more visible juddering when switching to 60. But it's not jarring or annoying.

So I'd say for most cases it doesn't matter. If you play fps games, there's a definite advantage to a higher frame rate. Unconsciously I guess you're able to use that extra info.

This isn't new either. I used to play Cs1.6 on crt. We'd often play on a lower resolution to get higher screen refresh. My screen would for example show 800x600 at 120hz.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I went from 30fps to 120fps and I can't tell the difference

Edit: Now that I've experimented a bit more there definitely is a difference and 120fps feels nicer to eyes. It's nothing huge but noticeable

[–] pgetsos@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have you tried going back to the 30 Hz one?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] maniel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

That's a bit extreme

[–] outadoc@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

60 to 120 Hz is definitely noticeable to me; when scrolling, it makes a big difference. When my phone auto-switches to low battery mode and to lower refresh rates I can usually tell the difference very quickly.

[–] SlothMama@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I still can't really tell the difference between 30 and 60 fps, so I run everything at 30 with higher settings. I feel like I'm winning.

[–] maniel@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Lol, I tried 30FPS cap in Genshin Impact and it became a stuttering mess

[–] ZILtoid1991@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Please note as you go higher up in the framerate, the gains will be less noticeable.

There's some term for this phenomenon, but I forgot it right when I wanted to type it. (please tell me again!😭)

[–] Moonwalk@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

After reading all the comments I'm thinking it really comes to what you're able to see. If you see no difference between 60 and 120, good for you, set it to 60 and save some battery. If you're able to see the difference, like I do, you'll just enjoy the extra smoothness. I've always seen the difference between 60 and 90/120. I think it also comes to the content. For me it's like this:

  • For videos, whatever refresh rate is ok as long as that was the intent of whoever created it.
  • For games 30 is playable, 60 is good, 120 is beautifully smooth. The type of game will also play a role here. An fps will benefit more from higher refresh rates.
  • For moving UI elements 30 is unusable, 60 is ok, 120 is really comfortable.

TL;DR Some people will see it, some people won't. Do whatever works best for you.

I use mine at 90HZ and i can clearly see the difference

[–] Tetra@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's harder to notice the difference at first. When I first got my 144Hz monitor I had trouble distinguishing between the two, but now I can immediately tell (and it's made going back to gaming at 60fps really difficult lol).

If you keep using 120Hz mode, then after a while you'll definitely feel the difference between the two.
That said unless you game on your phone a lot, I don't know how useful it is to have it set to 120, especially if it drains more battery.

[–] NightOwl@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Even moving windows around looks and feels stuttery on desktop at 60hz, which is a pretty simple action. Basic desktop navigation I find more bothersome than 60 fps in a video game, since the system just feels and looks less responsive when it comes to animations and scrolling and moving stuff around.

I had to replace my old monitor that was 60 hz that I was intended to use as my secondary, since it was way too jarring having the two side by side. I avoided using the second one because of how suddenly it felt laggy entering that domain. Just the cursor movement looked bad.

[–] Banana-Newsom@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

After awhile at 120hz, use someone's 60hz phone, you'll notice it.

[–] sudotstar@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is why I'm intentionally staying away from high-refresh-rate displays until I can feasibly upgrade everything I use to that standard (phone, TV+consoles, desktop monitors, etc). I don't know exactly what I'm missing out on and ignorance here is bliss.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SJ0@lemmy.fbxl.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I remember on crt's there was a massive difference between 60hz and 85 hertz, but my laptop has a 120 hertz screen and I really don't see much of a difference between it and 60 hertz and it at 120 hertz, there is some work out there by some people that suggest that it's because the CRT is just structured in such a way that you're going to notice improved frame rates better and it's going to look less blurry to your eyes.

[–] exscape@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

For me the biggest difference between 60 and 85 Hz on a CRT was that one gave me a massive headache and nausea within a few hours, and the other didn't.

Modern displays work differently though, especially LCDs which only really flicker if the backlight flickers. CRTs only display a small sliver of the image at any given time, while the rest is black or fading away until the next frame is drawn.

(Though I do see a big difference between 60 and 85 fps these days; 85-95 is where I start to find FPS games to not feel downright choppy, but there's still a big, big difference between 95 and 165.)

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Higher refresh rates make a bigger difference when physically larger portions of the screen are changing at once, and when there's fast movement on the screen. That's why it has a more noticeable effect on FPS games, where the entire screen changes when you move the mouse, and when you want to quickly move your aim to specific points. It's much more noticeable on a large display than it is on a phone screen, for example.

[–] exscape@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, indeed. But I find it very, very noticeable when just moving the mouse pointer too. Looks horrible on a 60 Hz screen.

The most important thing I think is movement speed. Extremely slow movements would look the same at 10 fps as 1000 fps (think a movement of 10 pixels per second, for example), while large movements look choppy at lower framerates. That's also (part of) why it's more important to have a high framerate in Quake/Unreal Tournament-style games than it is in e.g. first person puzzle games, latency being the other big one.

[–] woobie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Are you viewing dynamic or static content? For me, the difference is huge with games, etc but harder to tell with static images.

load more comments (1 replies)

I find it notice it the most on phones, like a huge difference for me. Not as much on PC monitors though.

[–] Cat@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I turned mine from 120hz (default) to 60hz to save battery. Probably the only reason I noticed is because I knew it was 120hz. The battery hit wasn't worth the subtle difference.

[–] rishabh@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

I just went from 90Hz to 60Hz and it was noticably worse. Promptly went back to 90 lol.

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In some cases I think it's actually worse. When scrolling through my code on 60hz, I can still read some words, because it's in the same place long enough. On 120hz, it's just a blur whilst scrolling, my eye can't focus on any words to read them.

For gaming it's nice because it reduces input lag, but when playing a game where the timing isn't that tight, it doesn't matter much.

[–] Anarchie99@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Should be the other way around. Motion clarity goes up with refresh rate.

I'm not sure how would it matter either. But I'm not gaming much on my phone so maybe that's that.

[–] keeb420@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

on a phone for me its not a useful feature. i notice it mainly when scrolling. meh. its fine on 60hz imho. maybe if i did more gaming on me phone or whatever id care more but just watching videos and browsing the web its fine.

[–] wqx@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My phone supports 60Hz and 120Hz (nothing in between) and the difference is definitly recognizable.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί