why dfq is always the guardian with the fearmongering? I can't take these guys seriously because every second article is something like this from some different threat. Also don't trust them since they fired Glenn Greenwald.
BehavioralClam
joined 8 months ago
I'm sorry, I tried to digest that write-up, but its just a spiteful personal wall of bs full of fringe leftist commentary and hate; the dude can't hold himself from insulting anyone he names in there because they somehow don't share his whatever perfect view of how everything is supposed to be. I can't take this kind of bs, i didn't even got to the third paragraph and already wanted to slap the guy and tell him to chill-dfq-off lmao.
If someone has a point, make the point, prove it, and then come up with the opinion based on that. (Like X did Y, hence X is an asshole.)
But in this case its quite clear the writeup is an "opinion first" look for proofs after situation.
Not even that. If the target has enough $ to pay a lawyer consultation or just doesnt care as to waste time/money on fighting for that hill; because any competent lawyer would have seen that the case is bs .
Fr, 200$?? like WTF?? For 200$ you can just find yourself a good expensive hooker and you save yourself the time and effor LOL But to be real, just maybe, dont go out with random golddiggers and basic girls. Personally, if its not a 50/50 or each one pays their stuff; its a red flag. And you can easily spot if its gonna be that or not from the tinder profile pic lol
Thats not describing "kidults" , but basically your regular basic normie consumer; just with "disney" tints, or a "geeky" millenial. People trained and raised to believe someone else always has the answer and the responsibility, and that the only thing they can do to somehow change their situation in life is to buy/consume something different.
who's upvoting from 420?
For 200$ that would be my thought process lol. I'm not spending 30$+ on a random meeting with someone im not even sure i'll click with.