Bishma

joined 1 year ago
[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago

The ones that I get excited to see new videos from are, in no particular order:

Lindsay Nikole

She's a biologist and does videos on prehistoric animals and time periods, that we know of. Entertaining videos and it turns out we studied under some of the same people.

acollierastro

Dr. Collier is a theoretical physicist who covers a wide arc a physics topics, and who did a pretty impressive review of Picard.

BobbyBroccoli

Very indepth and well researched videos about science and tech scandals and controversies

Dr Becky

Is an Oxford Astrophysicist who covers a lot of findings about JWT and will point out upcoming things in the night sky

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm one of those holdouts saying Disco and SNW aren't canon (because they break so much of it) but it didn't occur to me that, if they are then it means LD must be canonical too.

You may have changed my mind.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most of the time I wish the nutrients would just enter my system without me ever having to think or do anything about it. So I get as close to that as possible.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago

I'd be relieved for a 50/50 even though I'm guessing Fedderman is going to pull a Manchin and block progress.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Admittedly I've been thinking I'm overdue to rewatch nearly all of Ent, but I have a vague memory of this getting explained (in a hand wavely kind of way). Maybe in the scene where Archer tells small children they recycle their poop? Or maybe my brain invented a scene to maintain my suspension of disbelief.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 week ago

I use the phrase "wide-awake nightmare" kind of a lot.

At least I know where I picked it up from, the Screaming Skull episode of MST3k.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I occasionally hear "catty-corner" too.

 

The Chrome team says they're not going to pursue Web Integrity but...

it is piloting a new Android WebView Media Integrity API that’s “narrowly scoped, and only targets WebViews embedded in apps.”

They say its because the team "heard your feedback." I'm sure that's true, and I can wildly speculate that all the current anti-trust attention was a factor too.

 

Alternate title: Microsoft closes barn door after last horse seen leaving and starting a bot farm.

Microsoft is now announcing a huge cybersecurity effort, dubbed the Secure Future Initiative (SFI). This new approach is designed to change the way Microsoft designs, builds, tests, and operates its software and services today. It’s the biggest change to security efforts inside Microsoft since the company announced its Security Development Lifecycle (SDL) in 2004 after Windows XP fell victim to a huge Blaster worm attack that knocked PCs offline in 2003.

 

Another great article from 404 Media highlighting the power that the tech giants have amassed over how how we use the internet.

This brings me, I think, to the elephant in the room, which is the fact that Google has its hands on quite literally every aspect of this entire saga as a vertically integrated adtech giant.

This extreme power over the adtech and online advertising ecosystem is one of the subjects of an FTC antitrust suit against Google.

2
Make it RAID!!! (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
 

I made this many years ago and just stumbled on it. Who remembers the early days of EBS volumes on AWS and needing to raid 8 of them together to get high throughput?

 

There's been a string of security blunders in Azure in the last couple years but leaking a signing key and then trying to downplay it is really beyond the pale

view more: ‹ prev next ›