Butterpaderp

They're pedalling folinic acid cause it's one of dr. Oz's products, leucovorin. The goal is always money.

I wouldn't say this one was nonsensical litigation, he was selling pirated software. If he was doing it for free it'd be a much different case.

To me, it's a similar game to animal crossing. Lots of things to do and customize, not alot of depth. But, some people enjoy that, and that's okay. And I gotta give them credit for adding so many updates over the years.

I got a couple hundred dollars deep into hearthstone, but luckily they came out with cubelock and I lost all interest after having to fight that stupid deck over and over.

Having just replaced one, it's honestly not that bad, but it is nice to have a second pair of hands cause it's so heavy. There's a couple bolts on top, then you just tilt it forward and pick it up off the bracket

I dunno man, fishing line's pretty strong stuff

But what I'm saying is that this is normal practice for decades (!!!) now for all console manufacturers

I can't think of a single console that normalized banning people for buying used games...except for switch 2. Wanna give some examples?

Per the article, it wasn't a pirated game though, it was used. That's the issue here.

They can be ban happy with pirates if they want, but banning people from being able to just swap games in real life is fuckin dumb.

Right, but in the context of the original clip, we're talking about refusing them

Hypothetically, if you were in charge of screening immigrants, what kind of culture would you refuse?

Oh really, you don't see anything racist or xenophobic about taking refugees from white skinned countries, but refusing ones from dark skinned countries?

1.01 with the bundle, if you claim the free one first