ChaoticNeutralCzech

So they probably didn't output .raw images, I think those are more recent. That would have been a weird use of the file format!

FWIW, pixels don't have to be square or in a grid.

Are autochrome starch particles subpixels? How many are there in a pixel?

Some professional cameras take photos with hexagonal pixels, for example

Really? I thought the Bayer filter was near-universal, and Wikipedia does not list what you just mentioned.

Anyway, older LCDs in portable color TVs, cameras and camcorders did use that pattern but that's on the display side.

Pixel purists say pixels have to be in a square or rectangular grid. Stitching is a good analog example. Yet others think that 2-subpixel "pixels" (RG and BG, alternating in a checkerboard pattern), as seen on some OLED screens should be counted as half-pixels, like on Bayer-filter cameras.

Anyway, there are digital systems with other layouts:

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q137757955
Early pocket color LCD TVs, cameras and camcorders would use hexagonal grids similar to shadow mask CRTs' phosphor dots.

By the way, neither color CRT phosphor dots nor stripes are pixels because they're not individually addressable. In fact, depending on the beam's position, a single phosphor dot can represent a gradient, and on B/W CRTs the whole screen is a single phosphor-covered surface.

Another has a rotated eye

Being FOSS is not a prerequisite of E2EE but a prerequisite of knowing it's E2EE for sure. Like, I can give you a black box that prints PGP key pairs and says "includes RPGP, MIT-licensed PGP library" but you can't trust that the machine doesn't use modified, low-entropy RNG or exfiltrate the results. The communication you do with these PGP keys is technically E2EE − a third party server relaying your messages will not be able to read them, unless I provide them with the potentially not-so-secret "random" data my box generated.

But you're right: if my black boxes are also used to encrypt/decrypt the messages with "your" keys (made by them) and I run a non-transparent ssrvice that delivers the messages, there is a case for not calling it E2EE.

"Uh... Let's forget the leader thing then"

jorymo's previous alien bikini jumpscare was even scarier: turns out her spacesuit is a tesseract (bigger on the inside!)

To be fair, we don't have any pics of exoplanets. Technically, we could measure their surface temperature and basic chemistry through spectroscoopy but I don't think they reflect enough photons for our equipment. They are usually identified by dimming their star slightly when passing in front of it. This can give an estimated size and distance from their star. And maybe atmosphere composition if it refracts! So they're not naming this kind of picture but a bunch of data with big error bars.

My phone can't decode YouTube's WebM above 90 fps at 480p and 60 fps at 720p without a huge framedrop. The audio works fine though.

Ich hoffe, du wählst meine Beiträge nicht blind hoch! Denn bei mir "Chaotic Neutral" bedeutet, ich schwänke zwischen gut und böse.

Und danke, dass du mich zum 39c3 geleitet hast.

Auch bei legendären Beiträgern wie @ZonenRanslite@feddit.org lese ich zuerst den Inhalt (bei ihm ist es auch wert, Acht zu geben)