Chefdano3

joined 1 year ago
[–] Chefdano3@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

Hey now, we're supposed to be arguing here, don't go posting things about onions that I agree with. Onions suck, and overpower any food you add them to. Gross.

[–] Chefdano3@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Oh yeah, well have you considered that your face is flavorless?

I bet you didn't.

So take that.

[–] Chefdano3@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

You're bad at arguing.

I season my food. Read what I wrote.

I never mentioned French fries, I was talking mashed and baked potatoes, but if you wanna talk about french fries, those suck too.

[–] Chefdano3@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)
  1. Unseasoned meat can be delicious, the meat just has to be very good quality.

  2. More importantly, I don't mean seasonings. Yes absolutely salt and season your meals, but even salted and otherwise seasoned potatoes are still pretty dang bland. In order for potatoes to be good, you need to add gravy, or cheese, or bacon or a whole other variety of things and combos of other food to make potatoes tasty. I won't say that a loaded up baked or mashed potatoes with all the bits isn't good, because it is. It's just that potatoes themselves are overrated.

You can take any meat, steak, chicken, pork, whatever, season with salt and pepper, and it's good. They each have their own distinct flavor. You can lightly salt and oil a good handful of different vegetables and they're good on their own. Hell even plain ass white rice with salt, pepper, and butter is pretty good. Do the same with potatoes, still bland, meh at best.

[–] Chefdano3@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

I really don't think mashed potatoes are that good. I argue that any good meal needs to stand on its own, and any food that requires extra sauce, or other additives to make it good are not good enough for a meal.

Id even argue they are not even that good as a side dish, as combine with other food, the best they do is taste like the juice of meat, but more commonly they only add more blandness to whatever your eating, making it less than if eating without mashed potatoes.

[–] Chefdano3@lemm.ee 5 points 3 weeks ago

If it wasn't an interesting concept, then why does it say it is?

[–] Chefdano3@lemm.ee 25 points 2 months ago

YouTube is owned by Google

[–] Chefdano3@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

Wow, TIL that we have a cricket team.

[–] Chefdano3@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Ask him if he would like to take a trip to Ireland to celebrate his graduation. I'm sure he won't be starting work immediately, but if he already has a job it's an easy excuse for at least a 2 week vacation. You could offer to show him around where you live and all the cool spots. Introduce him to your friends and do some of the things you all usually do for fun. Then you can take a trip to the touristy spots, which is conveniently a great excuse to get a room for night in the city, ya know, to make sure you have enough time to see everything and not worry about the travel time and such. Then for the end of the trip, just spend the time relaxing, and hanging out together. Give yourselves the time to get comfortable doing the day to day routine, give him a chance to experience what regular life in Ireland might be if he were to stay a bit longer.

[–] Chefdano3@lemm.ee 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Wow this is an actually interesting question. At first it kinda of seems ridiculous that a provider of age restricted content put the onus of said age verification onto a completed unrelated company. To say the manufacturers of devices capable of going online are the ones responsible for verifying the age of the user seems backwards, and a little unfair to the makers of the devices.

But on the other hand, they make a good point that if one company is collecting info on users to verify if they are legally old enough to view the content, and if they are required to get legal documentation to prove it, That could be a security concern. If the site collects that information from it's users and their network gets compromised, the hacker obtains the legal documents of all of its users. However if you have your device get a certification of your age and be able to pass that cert to a site, and a hacker compromised your device, they would only get the information of that one user. In this way it would act like getting a drink wristband at a concert or large event. Instead of having to show your ID to a bunch of different people, you show it to one, and everyone else just sees that you've been verified of legal age without needing to see the actual ID.

On the other other hand, since personal devices are fully in the hands of the users, it would be pretty safe to assume that users will be able to trick the device into believing they are of legal age with relative ease, so it's effectiveness might not be that great.

Idk man, this is kinda interesting.

[–] Chefdano3@lemm.ee 10 points 6 months ago (14 children)

Which is exactly what Apple does with their iTunes store.

view more: next ›