Wedding photography is probably the best example of this - I don't think most people can imagine a world where AI generated art would be sufficient to replace a wedding photographer who's actually present at a real wedding, because the real world context of the wedding is what makes those photos significant, not just the quality of the photography itself.
I mostly agree. For me personally, photography is special because I'm aphantasiasic (no visual memory) and photographs can put me in the memories more solidly.
But I think that we'll see hybrid AI/real photography in weddings within 5 years. What I mean by this is the in person photography will proceed as normal but then all the photos are used to create an AI model of the event to allow the client to have photographs which may not have actually been taken. Models combined with photogrametry would allow highly accurate fakes.
The negative for us as photographers is that it will lower the bar. The level of skill and experience to produce a similar outcome to a low end professional will be minimal.
Much like my day job (IT) AI poses a risk that 'entry level' jobs will be mostly disappear. How do you get to be a mid level professional in either field? Being an 'entry level' professional and working your way up as you gain experience. The risk is that mid levels will dry up because there are too few jobs at the entry level to produce the required number of mid levels etc.
And the larger the capacity, the longer they generally last because the same memory storage cells are re-used less often.