Delayed response, but based on you liking Minecraft, survival type genre might be good.
Valheim and Project Zomboid are great games. Subnautica is very immersive. Stardew Valley is a lot of fun.
BTW, have you tried MineClone2 on Minetest. It's a Minecraft clone so much more fun than Minetest.
Is google needed? Could a mail alternative like proton mail be better?
Unless Quake was made with Copilot, that seems very unlikely:
Those that truly dislike MS and telemetry won't.
If I'm using non-free it is Jet Brains.
I tend to use Kate, KDevelop.
MS still slurping code into Copilot from Github and telemetry in VSCode.
By browsers do you mean search engines in the browsers? I use DDG for search. Firefox is king, browsers wise.
It is closed but not necessarily bad. It was rated highly on the Mozilla Privacy Not Included.
Your logic was insane and misplaced. We weren't talking about descendants. It was a weird logical reach.
This whole debate is about an 11 year old girl and 2 men that got mauled after she ran past a dog and got attacked. This debate is about safety and whether these dogs should be allowed as pets. You may want to shift the debate and move the goalposts, but no way is it justifiable.
If the people defending the breed of dogs aren't going to bother coming up with solutions, their views won't be taken seriously. A young girl got attacked here. A 10 year old got killed 2 years ago. A middle aged lady a few months ago in the UK. Dog attacks in Britain have quadrupled and this breed of dog is the largest perpetrator. If you are advocating maintaining the status quo, you are advocating for more deaths.
I agree they should be jailed and dog owners of many breeds should be licensed.
That is very tangential. You could just admit you were wrong and that it wasn't a British creation, name wise. Seems your ego is a little too frail for that. Sorry to see that.
To save dogs, you would advocate killing the children of slaves? The lengths you'll go...
I know the debate about nature vs nurture and it's relevant in some debates. Not this one. People do not have lions and tigers as pets. Some zoo owners probably feel they're passive with the right ownership. Doesn't make owning them good and sensible. If people cannot act sensibly (and they won't), legislation has to kick in.
It is a viscious cycle, and I dont disagree that owners are part of the problem. Shrugging and going "ah well" doesn't fix the problem. Doing nothing gives owners almost the legal freedom to use their dogs to kill folk and get away with it.
Claiming ignorance to avoid solving a problem is weak or deceptive.
These dogs are bred to be strong. To kill. They don't belong in homes and society near children. They should never have been bred in the first place nor imported, but that happened, so gotta deal with it.
People buy these dogs to be intimidating. Compensating for something, I expect. If people are licensed and can prove training, fine, keep them, but if they have already been raised bad, it's probably too late and too risky. A school girls runs past, and bam, disfigured.
You're assuming how this can be done. The law in the UK is that it is illegal to import or breed these dogs. You can implement legislation in which dogs can live out their lives and eventually it ain't a problem.
Of course, I am not willing to watch children and old people getting mauled because you care about violent dogs designed to kill. Kill 'em like they kill me burgers...
Legend. That is impressive. 50 per day?
Is this like a daily hobby?