CubitOom

joined 2 years ago
[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

:FEMA disaster response official Gregg Phillips teleports behind Vegeta:

Nothing Personal, Kid

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I thought he was wearing some crazy shoulder pads for a minute.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 9 points 4 days ago

Our current system is a risk to our very existence.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

i'm just not 100% sure where the morals/ethics line is supposed to go.

I'm not amoral it just seems like people arbitrarily draw lines and they seem so certain.

You have to draw your own lines, ones that are important to you. You shouldn't let others tell you where does lines are.

As Martin Luther King Jr said:

Ultimately you must do right because it’s right to do right. . . . You must do it because it has gripped you so much that you are willing to die for it if necessary. And I say to you this morning, that if you have never found something so dear and so precious to you that you will die for it, then you aren’t fit to live.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 39 points 4 days ago (2 children)

"side loading" == installing

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

I think these are all good questions to ask ourselves.

Is it first order disagreements like this NVIDIA boycott, or is it second order as well ? Meaning any company that willingly works with NVIDIA or explicitly buys new NVIDIA gpu's ?

It's going to depend on your interest or ability to research. However, if one were to simply buy used items when possible, or choose a brand one thinks aligns with themselves after some research, I think that's a good start.

GPU's right now are ridiculous which means the secondhand market is tight, if your timeframe/need is also tight then it might not be possible to always do the "right thing™".

If one thinks they might need compromise their morals, I think they should really consider their options. I'd rather pay full price for an old used GPU than give nvidia any money, but that's my personal opinion.

Why pick 2014

I think this is just because car companies weren't yet starting to surveil their drivers as part of a new revenue stream until 2014. You can read more about it.


Personally, I've removed myself from the American market about as much as I can while still living in the USA.

I've divested from American stocks.

I try to make/grow my own whenever possible, and rely on my local community more. I even started a community regenerative farm.

If I do think I need to buy something new, I try to either buy European, Japanese, or from a few other choice markets depending on the product, like South America for specialty wood and coffee direct from as small a manufacturer as possible.

Homespun movement

I don't expect everyone to live like this, not everyone has the luxury. But I do hope people atleast try to not pay companies that harm them.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's possible to need a GPU for work and other functions. But you never need a new anything.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (5 children)

new

New is the key word here.

Buying new boosts sales metrics, incentives investors & management, and is blissful consumerism.

We should be boycotting all companies that we don't agree with. And NVIDIA is a department of war contractor and American Regime mega donor.

If you actually need something, and it's possible to need a GPU, then you can buy second hand from within your community. Try to buy as local as possible, look for things like surplus office equipment or at local repair shops.

In your example of a car, buying a used car is also better than buying a new car in many ways, especially since cars made before 2014 were not able to surveil you.

Boycott bad companies / practices, and stop consuming the latest slop they put in the trough.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 22 points 5 days ago (26 children)

It's optional to buy new gpus and games that require them.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 12 points 5 days ago (2 children)
 

The only passenger in the car when an American citizen was shot and killed by a federal officer in South Texas last year had planned to speak up and contradict the government’s account of the shooting. However, the passenger, Joshua Orta, died in an unrelated car crash over the weekend.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/60478981

Borges alleges that a little-known federal tech team called the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, copied the government’s master Social Security database into a cloud system that lacked normal oversight.

If his account is correct, the mishandling of this information could expose hundreds of millions of people to fraud and abuse for the rest of their lives.

 
 

Discord has announced that it will begin requiring government-issued ID or face scans for use of large parts of its platform, extending beyond its original compliance with UK ID Verification Law and various Online Safety Acts around the world. What we found disturbing was what seems to be Discord's strange web of connections, including links to the UK Government via partners, links to Peter Thiel and Palantir (and even Epstein) via venture capital-funded identity verification services, and Discord's prior partner data breaches leading to concerns of the application's ability to protect its users. This all comes at a time when Discord is rumored to be preparing for an IPO, which would be an awfully good time for Discord to suddenly know a whole lot more about its users -- data that could be valuable for marketing or other disagreeable uses. At least as a positive, this has led to a rise of Discord alternatives.

 
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/33758623

This is a group reading of of the book Full Spectrum Resistance by Aric McBay, organized by the Cooperation Tulsa Education Program.

List of all of the reading sessions so far:

view more: next ›