Darkassassin07

joined 1 year ago
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago

Oh, most definitely. Tracking battery wear should 100% be standard practice, and considered when buying/selling used EVs.

I just find it interesting that Tesla tells you to do something, then ultimately punishes you for doing so.

If you're not supposed/allowed to use it as a stationary power station; don't advertise that use case as a selling point.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

The Cybertruck explicitly advertises its 120/240vac inverter for 'job site tools' and other similar uses; then voids your warranty if you actually use it 'while stationary'.

Here's Louis Rossmann ranting about it for a bit.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Any idea when a fix might make it into Jerboa?

This is getting really frustrating to deal with every day...

/edit; ask and you shall receive... Woke up to a new update. Fingers crossed it fixes this crash :D

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 48 points 4 months ago (5 children)

If SpaceX moves, and it's worker's are unwilling/unable to move; does that grant them severance?

I'd take that out.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 30 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Maybe 5 years ago. They've had plenty of time to see reason and jump ship to anyone else. Elon hasn't exactly been quiet with his escapades...

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

Reminds me of this doc I watched a couple weeks ago.

TLDW; psyco travelled across the country to kill his mom, then drove back. He bought a burner phone at the start of his trip, but kept his normal phone with him the whole time. The cops were able to track both devices as they each connected to the same cell towers while traveling together from the west coast, to the east coast, and back again.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 20 points 4 months ago (6 children)

Did... Did you just ask; why creating photo-realistic sexually explicit material of real children, should be illegal?

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 30 points 4 months ago (8 children)

As far as I understand; it's not the tools used that makes this illegal, but the realism/accuracy of the final product regardless of how it was produced.

If you were to have a high proficiency with manual Photoshop and produced similar quality fakes, you'd be committing the same crime(s)

creating child sex abuse images

and

offenses against their victims’ moral integrity

The thing is, AI tools are becoming more and more accessible to teens. Time, effort, and skill are no longer roadblocks to creating these images; which leaves very very little in an irresponsible teenagers way...

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I could be wrong; but it came across to me as a "we'll sell you one at a special discount"

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca -5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Oh god! The Chinese know how tight my shoes are? They could overthrow the entire globe with such devastating info!

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

China, so definitely not the same worker protections; but where I'm at, that kind of deduction isn't legal.

view more: ‹ prev next ›