Delta_V

joined 11 months ago
[–] Delta_V@midwest.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Storing carbon as sodium formate has the same problem as storing it as trees - bacteria will eat it and release CO2. Its also not useful as portable fuel - its energy density is an order of magnitude less than kerosene.

Its potential use as a battery is interesting though. I can imagine a system where a long lasting catalyst is used to fill a tank of sodium formate using waste CO2 from industrial processes and excess electrical generation capacity from renewable sources like wind and solar, and the machines that use sodium formate to generate electricity at times of low wind and solar generation could potentially be less polluting overall compared to mining lithium for new batteries and recycling worn out lithium batteries.

[–] Delta_V@midwest.social 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

AI does not learn and transform something like a human does.

But they do learn. How human-like that learning may be isn't relevant. A parrot learns to talk differently than a human does too, but African greys can still hold a conversation. Likewise, when an AI learns how to make art by studying what others have made, they may not do it in exactly the same way a human does it, but the products of the process are their own creations just as much as the creations of human artists that parrot other human artists' styles and techniques.

[–] Delta_V@midwest.social 0 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Everyone should be assumed to be able to look at it, learn from it, and add your style to their artistic toolbox. That's an intrinsic property of all art. When you put it on display, don't be surprised or outraged when people or AIs look at it.

[–] Delta_V@midwest.social 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (5 children)

That's not just an idea - its physical reality. You can't get your physical needs met in old age if you didn't win the lotto. Suicide is the retirement plan for most of us non-boomers.

[–] Delta_V@midwest.social 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah, that's what I meant.

[–] Delta_V@midwest.social 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

The Tesla brand has become distasteful due to the owner's antics, and no other carmaker builds an EV that's capable of long range travel due to a lack of quick charge capability and infrastructure.

edit: "the owners" meaning the person who owns the company, ie Elon, not the people who bought the cars. Apostrophe added for clarity.

[–] Delta_V@midwest.social 2 points 11 months ago

Or maybe an accessibility improvement. You don't need to practice creating your own works of art over many years anymore, or have enough money to commission a master artist. The AI artists are good enough and work for cheap.

[–] Delta_V@midwest.social 44 points 11 months ago (1 children)

While we're digging shit up, lets lay some fiber.

[–] Delta_V@midwest.social 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

A "free" cup of coffee that you need to buy food and pay medical bills for.

[–] Delta_V@midwest.social 3 points 11 months ago

That's still too cheap.

There's probably a price that could be paid to encourage a higher birth rate, but I doubt the governments who have attempted such programs were willing to aim high enough.

[–] Delta_V@midwest.social 65 points 11 months ago

Adding this to your uBlock Origin filters also makes the problem go away:

www.youtube.com##+js(nano-stb, resolve(1), *, 0.001)

[–] Delta_V@midwest.social 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The insurance companies will go for it if the data shows driverless cars cause fewer accidents and lower claims versus human drivers, but it seems like that data will be a long time coming because right now the court of public opinion goes nuts when a driverless car hits someone while ignoring all the times that a human does the same. It makes no sense, and I hope the insurance companies can make it make sense soon.

view more: next ›