Yes Hamas are not nice people and would happily kill every Israeli, but that doesn't mean Israel should not exercise caution to avoid killing palestinians.
DogMuffins
joined 1 year ago
This is a really salient point.
I get a lot of news from Australian Broadcasting Corp. Generally considered to be reasonably balanced.
Just as a "random" example, this is the most recent article on the gaza conflict:
It's factual as in "this person said this, someone said that", but there's no mention very much of what Gaza's political leadership (yes, Hamas) has to say. By contrast, in the Ukraine conflict it was all about what Ukraine had to say but there were at least interjections of Russia's public statements.
That said, they're not really pulling their punches, comparing death tolls et cetera.
"I was able to find something that aligned with my assertion"
"I call it the phishing buster buster buster"
Wait, am I understanding this correctly?
On Dec 22nd, just 3 days shy of Christmas, we may hear the delightful news that Trump is actually facing some consequences?
"Is this about that hush money thing again?"
This narrative sounds nice and makes me feel safe, it must be true.
I don't think there's consensus on the numbers you're quoting.
That's not what's happening though.
Regardless, hostages require at least negotiation. They could execute a few hostages to provoke israel further.
Their objective was to provoke this response from Israel. Hostages really force Israel to act immediately.
Your entire post is about managing a neurodivergent person. That's a diagnosis.
It's completely inappropriate to make assumptions about a co-worker's mental faculties, and to act on those assumptions.
OP did try talking to the person but frankly, doesn't seem very experienced in that regard.
OP needs to build a working relationship with this guy such that he doesn't respond to feedback as though it's a personal attack. The only way to do that is talking.
This is such a lame argument.
You could just beep your horn every time you see another car.