Drewfro66

joined 2 years ago
[–] Drewfro66@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 week ago

The latest update improved performance a ton for me

[–] Drewfro66@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Depends what's in season. Where I live: crabapples, blackberries, Japanese Silverberries. There's probably a ton more, but these are the things I feel comfortable eating whenever I find them at a park etc

[–] Drewfro66@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 month ago

There were not two states in Korea at the time, a "North Korea" and a "South Korea". There is one nation - Korea - and it's Southern half was occupied by a foreign force. Literally - South Korea was not liberated from Japan at the end of WWII, Japan transferred it's occupation to the United States.

[–] Drewfro66@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Amber Volcel Police Whataboutism

[–] Drewfro66@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 5 months ago

Marxism is a materialist worldview, not a moral one. I could give my personal opinion, but Marxism can never answer a question that begins with "Is it moral/ethical/permissible to...?"

A tractor is a means of production. Owning a tractor would make you a member of the Petite Bourgeoisie - a person who owns their own means of production, but does not own enough to get by without also working, typically self-employed. Leasing the tractor to others doesn't change this, but it is an example of Rentierism - something that will not exist under Communism. If you owned a thousand tractors, and could live comfortably off of the rent you charged others to use them, that would make you a Capitalist, a member of the Bourgeoisie.

Different people will have different thresholds over whether they think some Rentierism is acceptable. I believe it is fine as long as you remain small-scale and have affordable prices. Others may disagree, believing that either all Rentierism is acceptable until Socialism is achieved or that Rentierism is never acceptable. Marxism cannot give an answer to a moral question, and so the answer is personal.

[–] Drewfro66@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 6 months ago (3 children)

It does make sense, it just has slightly abbreviated grammar - in the traditional style of a newspaper headline.

While "Biden is going to lose the election" is "proper" grammar, abbreviating it to "Biden to lose election" is also completely valid, within certain contexts (such as a headline).

[–] Drewfro66@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 7 months ago

One thing that people seem to take for granted is that these government-hosted instances would be open to the public for account creation, while this doesn't necessarily have to be the case. Not everyone can get a statedepartment.gov email address. Not everyone needs to be able to get a @statedepartment.mastodon.gov handle. Just leave it to public officials only.

[–] Drewfro66@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I spent too long looking over this picture for little hidden details the artist might have added before realizing there is like a 90% chance it's AI generated and there are no little hidden details

[–] Drewfro66@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I don't know Lawful Neutral or Neutral Evil

view more: next ›