No need to be so extreme. We still need village and middle sized city. But the dead zones ? I think it make no sense for the state to support a full service at the top of its fingers
Epialtes
joined 2 days ago
Létal injection work well in theory
The problem is, skilled people don’t want to do it. And pharmaceutical companies don’t want their products used in it. So it’s done by unskilled people with a reduced access to products.
Humility. All I got in life, I got it with people’s help. The day I become one of these « I PUT MYSELF BY MY BOOSTRAP » guy, I hope someone will slap me
People in micro village should be moved or let to themselves.
It is a pretty violent opinion. But there are too many of these village of 200 people, 180 retired, 10 unemployed and 1 bakers. These area are basically dead, but because a few people absolutely want to stay living there, the state still has to do the whole infrastructure, security, civil servant, healthcare stuff.
This is an incredible waste of ressources that could be used elsewhere.
Well it is relative to the country situation
Take Francois Hollande. In American politics he would indeed have been at the left.
But in French politics, on was considered at the rich of the current situation. And at the very right of what you would expect from a left wing man.
Remember that you’re Singapore’s leftist is your Cuban’s libertarian.
Probably high.
Of course most people would be shocked at even the idea. But given time, paranoia, stress,… they would end up finding it necessary
War cause extreme polarization. Extreme polarization turn the nicest purest man into a sociopathic monster.
It’s an US thing too. I guess you guys would call it « living off the grid »? The big difference is in Europe the government has the responsibility to make this grid available for all. So if you live in isolation you kinda force a large expense to keep you connected to civilization