Last I heard, Monica Lewinsky does, and her opinion matters more than any of our.
Exatron
joined 2 years ago
I don't understand why people are bitching that the companies that they choose to use have so much power over their purchasing decisions. "First this, next sex toys! Then contraceptives!" Like Jesus fuck bro have you not heard of cash?
Because that's what groups like Collective Shout do, sparky. They think just acknowledging that LGBT people exist is "too adult".
When was the last time you paid cash for a Steam game?
Strangely, this may be the one time when the science agrees with them.
European Commission. (2003, April). The evaluation of antimicrobial treatments for poultry carcasses.
European Commission. (2008, April). Environmental impact and effect on antimicrobial resistance of four substances used for the removal of microbial surface contamination of poultry carcasses
European Food Safety Authority. (2015). Risks for public health related to the presence of chlorate in food.
It's still "proper bread", sparky. You clearly know nothing about baking.
Yes, for tax purposes. It says nothing about the nutritional content.
The bread being considered cake thing isn't what you think it is. It was a matter of taxation, not nutrition.
Every chemical is potentially risky in sufficient amounts, even water.
It's not as much of a thing in the US today, but even the European Commission has found that it's not a problem unless you're eating 5% of your bodyweight in chlorinated chicken every day. It's mostly protectionism for European poultry farmers under the guise of safety.
Sources: European Commission. (2003, April). The evaluation of antimicrobial treatments for poultry carcasses.
European Commission. (2008, April). Environmental impact and effect on antimicrobial resistance of four substances used for the removal of microbial surface contamination of poultry carcasses
European Food Safety Authority. (2015). Risks for public health related to the presence of chlorate in food.
I can think of one thing he could do that would get him lots of good press, but it's typically a TOS violation.
It's also clear that you're making things up, sparky.
You're still a tinfoil hat wearing crackpot, spud.
view more: next ›
I didn't want him killed, or even hurt, but I'm not going to pretend he was a good person. He was a loudmouth pseudointellectual who made a living out of spreading hate and calls for violence.