Those rules are harmful to teenagers
Fal
joined 1 year ago
I think they meant humanity, not just the reader
So you're saying in the 90s, the "let's all crossdress at school" was all about normalizing clothing regardless of gender, being inclusive of people's gender and clothing choices, and and destigmatizing gender non confirming people? It wasn't because the idea of a boy in a skirt was a concept that should me mocked and thought of as a joke?
The statement was "look at how funny it is to wear clothes of the wrong gender. Isn't it hilarious that a woman could be wearing pants?! Hahahaha"
Yeah. No thanks
I thought this was going to turn into an egg_irl comment
Why does everything have to be a video? Write an article, wtf. I'm not watching a video with a clickbait title like this
How much money are you willing to spend? It's likely 2 orders of magnitude lower than what it will cost
At least there, they’re not shitting in communal areas, leaving used needles in the park, and breaking into houses.
That's been working really well, huh
I am not happy with my tax dollars going to house someone who would rather feed their meth or opiate addiction than get a job. Let them dig their hole and bury themselves in it.
Except that's not what happens. What happens is your tax dollars go to locking those people up, cleaning up their encampments, paying for their ER visits
TikTok ran a deepfake ad of an AI MrBeast hawking iPhones for $2 — and it's the 'tip of the iceberg'
That's already illegal though
Ok, so if it's not immoral, you don't see any wrong with the headline?
No, it's rules like "homosexual content is harmful to kids so it will be banned".
And adults couldn't possibly like strawberry. That MUST be about addicting kids! Not that that has fuck all to do with what we're talking about here. We're talking about banning kids from being able to talk about their sexuality and gender in safe spaces
Not a blanket ban, just the likely result.