FedX

joined 1 month ago
[–] FedX@quokk.au 2 points 1 day ago

Thanks, that does help some. Eq 22 is what I was reading, and yeah, it's a weird and confusing derivation. In reading Eq 22 closer, it's helpful, but not as helpful as I would have liked. What's funny in reading it is that it's also in correlation to q, which I would have expected to be calculated in terms of v. sigh maybe it would be better if I went through and derived the equations myself, would probably be more useful that way anyway.

 

I am trying to mathematical model a passive Magnetorheological damper. Broadly speaking, this would work by having a magnet sit on the damper shaft near the damper body. As the shaft moves, it would induce an eddy current in the damper body, creating a magnetic field. Not only would this magnetic field oppose the magnet's motion, but it would increase the viscosity of the magnetorheological fluid inside the damper body. On paper, this would rapidly increase the damping forces with increasing shaft speeds, allowing for more controlled shaft speed.

Fortunately, I found a paper discussing a damper similar to my ideas. Unfortunately, I don't really understand the math, and I need the damping force equation in terms of velocity to validate the application I have in mind. Linked is the paper I am referring to.

For my purposes, I would also want to model separate traditional high and low speed compression and rebound circuits moving through traditional mechanical damping circuits, along with some other damping features. However, that's a problem for future FedX, right now I really just care about the broad differences in damping characteristics as a function of shaft velocity.

[–] FedX@quokk.au 5 points 1 day ago

The posts about escape velocity (or speed if you prefer) are correct. To that I want to add the following: Gravitational effects technically never end with distance, only become weaker. It's also important to note that every object has a gravitational field, it's just that it needs to be ridiculously big for the force to have any real effect. Gravitational force can be described by the following equation: image
where r is the distance between the two objects, and the rest does not matter for us today.

This is the same as the inverse square law of light (this is a pretty good visual):

image

This means if you double the distance between yourself and a star, the strength of its light reaching you will quarter. This is also very similar to the math used to describe electric and magnetic field interactions, but I won't go into that today.

This is why scientists are able to measure gravitational waves from collapsing stars and quasars and stuff at the LIGO Gravitational Wave Observatory, just like how we can observe the light coming from distant stars. However, there is a point where the force of gravity becomes so weak as to be inconsequential, just like how at the edge of the solar system, the sun merely looks like a bright star. That is described as the gravitational sphere of influence, the rough approximation of the distance from a celestial body where it exerts the most gravitational force on a given object.

Escape speed is the speed at which an object must travel, given a distance from said body, to escape its sphere of influence. The Earth+moon have a sphere of influence of about 9.29E5 km.

[–] FedX@quokk.au 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sorry to hear that. I'm in a similar boat (and have been there many times before, and will be there many times after). Heal up and feel better!

[–] FedX@quokk.au 2 points 2 weeks ago

No. I injured myself doing BMX(ish) style street riding. Nothing too bad, but I will be off the bike and doing leg-only exercises for a week or two. I was also in a no riding zone, during graduation on a fairly capitalistic college campus, but hey, biking's not a crime (and even if it was, legality != morality)!