Federal_Heart_2540

joined 1 year ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
[Christopher Ward] New C1 moonphase in c/watches@style.land
[identify] Help me identify this watch in c/watches@style.land
Inherited in a will was offered $10k by other party. Am I being ripped off? More info… in c/watches@style.land
[–] Federal_Heart_2540@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

A Disappointing Replica of the AP Royal Oak

  1. Incorrect Logo: One of the most glaring issues with this so-called Royal Oak is the logo on the dial. The iconic Audemars Piguet logo is a mark of quality and precision, but this logo is noticeably off. The font and detailing are wrong, indicating a lack of attention to the finer details that Audemars Piguet is known for.

  2. Bracelet Tolerance: Genuine Royal Oak watches are crafted with precision, ensuring the perfect alignment of the bracelet links. However, this counterfeit watch's bracelet tolerance is way off. The links don't align seamlessly, and the clasp lacks the smooth operation that characterizes the real Royal Oak.

  3. Oddly Positioned Automatic Sign: The automatic sign on the counterfeit watch sits too high above the dial. On a genuine Royal Oak, this feature is carefully integrated into the design, but here it's awkwardly positioned, further underscoring the lack of craftsmanship.

  4. Calendar Window: The calendar window on this fake Royal Oak is a mess. The font is inconsistent, and the alignment is off. The authentic Royal Oak showcases meticulous attention to detail in its calendar function, making this discrepancy highly noticeable.

Inherited in a will was offered $10k by other party. Am I being ripped off? More info… in c/watches@style.land