Fifrok

Yes? The new path is there because it's still shorter, people don't walk in straight lines and sharp angles. That design is still lazy and not thought out

Oh. What is the point then? /gen

It didn't work out because the design didn't change, it was reinforced. Each attempt failed because there was no actual effort to understand why it's not working. Like wraping a leaky rusted pipe in ducktape.

To everybody acting like the desire path is the problem:

1. If the problem for you is that it's 'bad' or 'illegal', grow a spine so that when you need to break the law, for something that matters, you can do it with dry pants.
2. If the design doesn't take into account how people will interact with it, it's bad and lazy. Only time it would be acceptable to 'force' a way to interact with something is when there are safety concerns, and there are none here.
3. You are traped in a cage of your own making, break free or perish like the dog you are.

I remember hearing the officier in question 'thought it was a blutooth speaker' but it might have been just a rumor or I'm remembering wrong (I hope so atleast)

In Poland we can't even trust the police to be responsible for their own safety (a officer used a grande launcher in his office), or even the millitary to handle logistics (landmines got delivered to ikea)

1. Wasn't there one in New York just this week (and in diffrent states)?
2. This is a community about europe, why would you expect info about an anti trump rally in here?

The most common justification for taxes on tabacoo products is that they're bad for the health of the general public, and the same goes for e-smoking.

This is only semi-related but I dislike e-smoking more than cigs, mainly cuz people that vape seem to think nobody is bothered by it and sometimes just straight up do it in public buildings, smokers atleast are selfaware and at the very least step away from people when they need a puff from the good'ol cancer stick

After Germany invaded Poland they have continued to sit by and do about fuck all for a year.

But we do, in fact, have enough information to call Trump a fascist (and thus anyone who is a suporter of his). The defintion of fascism, as stated by wikipedia is:

• far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist political ideology and movement.
• characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition
• belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived interest of the nation or race
• strong regimentation of society and the economy.
• Opposed to communism, democracy, liberalism, pluralism, and socialism

Trump has, in the not so distant past:

• Claimed expanded executive authority
• refused to transfer power after losing an election
• has praised authoriterian leaders
• Frequently made appeals to racial and cultural superiority (e.g., calling certain countries “shitholes,” claiming immigrants are “poisoning the blood” of 'America')
• Attempted to delegitimize dissent or protest as unpatriotic
• Just a couple of days ago called the national guard (not sure if that's the correct translation) on anti-deportation protesters
• Has, and is, sending deported people into de-facto concentration camps
• Has suggested using the military for domestic policing
• Has endorsed populist economic nationalism (tariffs, breaking international trade norms, attacking corporations that oppose him)

And much more, but let's just jump to a conclusion anyways, right? Nazwałbym Pana debilem, ale tak nie wypada, to tego nie zrobę.

Yes, no genocide on homeground (unless you could count the genocide of native americans as still on going), but there's slavery (and it has a big enough market influence that it lowers wages significantly) and concentration camps.

Governments get to decide what speech is illegal these days, and do so to push their agenda.

That has always been the case, pick any time in any goverment and you will find that. That's just how goverments work.

things that the far left don’t like so call “far right hate speech” to censor it and push their desired narrative

Please, do tell, where is this place that has a 'far left' with enough power to that? Not germany, CDU is in power right now and they are center-right, left-wing (but not far-left) Die Linke has got around 8-9% of votes in the last election. There is not a single european country that has a far-left party in power. The biggest far-left organisation in my area is food-not-bombs (pl. jedzenie zamiast bomb) but I think they would have a hard time trying to censor anything, considering that the only thing they do is give meals for people in need.