FiskFisk33

joined 2 years ago
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

i actually believe this one though

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 11 months ago

"thats a bit harsh'"

reads parenthesis

"oh, ohhhh"

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

probably yes, if we accept the mountains of dead human babies the research would inevitably produce.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 4 points 11 months ago

I think they convey the dramatic pause perfectly

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 5 points 11 months ago

the latter, they are the largest instances, and it's generally healthy to spread stuff out

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 7 points 11 months ago

legal or not it's absolutely bonkers. Safety should be the legal assumption for marketing terms like this, not an optional extra.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 11 months ago

or a flipped comparison operator, or a "//TODO test code please remove"

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 90 points 11 months ago (16 children)

Tesla, which has repeatedly said the system cannot drive itself and human drivers must be ready to intervene at all times.

how is it legal to label this "full self driving" ?

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 5 points 11 months ago

division has no power here old man!

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

oh, I misunderstood

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 14 points 11 months ago (5 children)

would have to be quite a few bears to avoid heavy inbreeding

view more: ‹ prev next ›