FlickOfTheBean

Hmm I wonder if I may have shot past the more straightforward way to parse it.

I'm coming from a stance where "don't do it as soon as you know it's ableist" is voiceless rule, so that significantly colors how I'm interpreting it.

That response was more me being like "oh wow this is essentially saying ignorance is an excuse for using ableist language" (caveats run amok here like "only when there are no known other words" as well as "strictly only when one isn't employing a shitty stereotype when referring to whoever they're referring to")

Admittedly, I can see how that is still a less than desirable takeaway, but all I'm trying to say is I 100% agree with what you've written.

Tldr; thank you for the clarification! Full agree and this is mostly just me trying to figure out where some disconnect is

My biggest take away was:

Ableism is not a list of bad words. Language is one tool of an oppressive system. Being aware of language -- for those of us who have the privilege of being able to change our language -- can help us understand how pervasive ableism is. Ableism is systematic, institutional devaluing of bodies and minds deemed deviant, abnormal, defective, subhuman, less than. Ableism is violence.

So the language itself isn't ableist, technically, according to this, but abilism is when the person using the language thinks of the negative stereotypes associated and uses that to justify some shitty position or action.

So in other words, while lame is acknowledged as a problematic word, it's not inherently abilist to use it, which is not a takeaway I was expecting to get.

Let me know if I misread it, but thank you for posting! It was an informative read!

User generated content eating itself.

Not an ouroboros, no, much more like, a human centipede

Bosses self reporting as dumbasses, as usual

Sr3 was the Skyrim to Sr2's Morrowind. Shinier but simplified. A good entry game to get to Sr2 imo.

(Personally I wasnt a fan of Sr4 because it felt like it was just a really expensive dlc. Didn't really add anything to Sr3 imo, but since there is evidence of people liking it here, I'm not going to come after it too hard. It might be a great entry title for getting to Sr3 to get to Sr2 eventually, and imo that's good enough for me to be happy about it getting mentioned)

We had some demanding clients lol

I remember having to use pie.htc to hack rounded corners for buttons into ie6. I remember liking ie7 a little bit better, but ie8 felt like a god send compared to 6 lmao

I recall having to support multiple versions of ie as well at the same time as well. I can't remember what year we dropped support for ie6 but it wasn't too long after I started.

I danced every time we got to drop another ie support version all the way up to 11

I do web dev and I can say I was super guilty of this back in the 2010s. I bit the hype hard, and now we're getting right back to the circumstances that made ie such a POS to work with. (In my defense, I got my dev job in 2013 and had to develop for ie6. It's not a good defense, but I think that really lead to my overhype for google. I had no knowledge of chrome's bloated whale carcass days, so it always felt like the browser that "just worked ™")

Market monopoly inspires evil in the good intentioned. Market monopoly also inspires nefariousness in the evil.

I'd say this is the sort of thing that inspired Google to remove the "don't be evil" from their guidelines.

Probably when "I use ie to download chrome" became a mainstream meme.

Unfortunately this is a money-ocracy (data-exploitation-ocracy), not a democracy.