It's not my favourite intervention to improve transit, but it does have some benefits, like reduced dwell times from faster boarding on buses.
The important thing is that it might get a candidate elected who can perform long-term improvements.
GissaMittJobb
joined 2 years ago
I run a Switch as well but not quite as complex as your method, although with some similarities I suppose.
Approximate method, probably mostly based on James Hoffmanns method:
21g beans / 300 ml water / grind setting unknown, not too fine not too coarse I suppose
- Prewarm Switch with 100 C water while grinding beans
- Heat water to 70 C
- Pour 42g water, ensure everything is wet
- Release water and let bloom for 45 seconds
- Heat water to 100 C while waiting
- Close switch, pour 208g water (scales now at 250g)
- Let steep for 2 minutes
- Stir bed
- Steep another 30 seconds
- Release, pour another 50g water
- Enjoy
Saturn Devouring His Beans
As far as I'm concerned, Hochul can go right ahead and fuck herself on account of her attempted ratfucking of the congestion pricing, and doubly so for arbitrarily lowering the price and dealing a massive blow to future infrastructure in the process.
I'd rather see a train, but this is still better than nothing
I'd be impressed with any model that succeeds with that, but assuming one does, the complete works of Shakespeare are not copyright protected - they have fallen into the public domain since a very long time ago.
For any works still under copyright protection, it would probably be a case of a trial to determine whether a certain work is transformative enough to be considered fair use. I'd imagine that this would not clear that bar.
I don't think anyone would consider complete verbatim recitement of the material to be anything but a copyright violation, being the exact same thing that you produce.
Fair use requires the derivative work to be transformative, and no transformation occurs when you verbatim recite something.
It's extremely frustrating to read this comment thread because it's obvious that so many of you didn't actually read the article, or even half-skim the article, or even attempted to even comprehend the title of the article for more than a second.
For shame.
...no?
That's exactly what the ruling prohibits - it's fair use to train AI models on any copies of books that you legally acquired, but never when those books were illegally acquired, as was the case with the books that Anthropic used in their training here.
This satirical torrent client would be violating the laws just as much as one without any slow training built in.
How is Daniel Ek a nazi? That's a wild take if I've ever heard one.