GiveMemes

joined 1 year ago
[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"Allowing the rich and powerful to get around copyright is good, actually, because it means copyright MAY someday go away"

[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 2 points 6 days ago

Read that as peloton and was incredibly confused

[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah idk why I'd be comparing two American companies outside of the US. Fair enough I guess though...

[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 9 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Maverick.

According to the American consumer, they are affordable, or else they wouldn't be the most popular new car.

Also, you were the one that brought up affordability.

I drive a 90s volvo and you can pry it from my cold dead hands. I have no intention of buying a new vehicle any time soon. It has nothing to do with me being out of touch and everything to do with statistics concerning vehicle sales.

[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's possible for the stock market only to grow because it externalizes costs (environmental damage, health of workers, etc.), and if that's the case, we need to see if society is actually proceeding in a positive direction as a whole (I generally believe this to be the case), but consider for a moment that the economic windfall experienced by many western nations was (and still is in many ways, think banana plantations) largely made possible by the subjugation of imperialized nations. In this case, was the economic windfall experienced by the imperial powers and their trade partners actually a good for society as a tide that rose all boats, or not?

If we fail to consider the biggest losers of the stock market, those that cannot even necessarily participate, it becomes much closer to gambling at the very least. I'm not here to have an argument about whether or not capitalism and the stock market and such things are actually good or bad for society as a whole, just that it's easy to ignore the biggest losers of the system by virtue of the fact that they don't necessarily even invest in the first place. In this case, the universe is the casino, and humanity are the gamblers, as compared to just the stock market being the casino and the investors the gamblers.

Not that your comment is wrong necessarily just that there's more ways of thinking about it.

[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 38 points 1 week ago (6 children)

People can't afford Ford anymore

Reality, in which the ford f series is the most sold vehicle for the past 42 years

Pick one

Ford is moving its prices upwards because people want and pay for what they're offering, very clearly given the statistics we have. Also to say that tesla is the brand regular people can afford when both brands have ev trucks and one has a starting msrp almost 30k more than the other is kinda hilarious.

Lastly, ford has a vehicle with an msrp of 23,920 while the lowest priced tesla vehicle is 38,890 dollars. Even taking gas savings over 5 years into account, ($4,223 if you happen to live near my area and drive about 10k miles per year) the tesla is significantly more expensive. Clearly, tesla is not the company concerned with the common man. To make that point even more clear though, one needs only to compare tesla to the Korean and Chinese EVs that are being offered at significantly lower prices.

[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 1 points 4 weeks ago

Jsyk any self-respecting tankie would have said cpc bc that's the actual English acronym translation ig (communist party of China) I'm not entirely sure abt this tho as I only really remember it from arguing with one of them.

[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 46 points 4 weeks ago (21 children)

Why? This has literally always been the case, but now they're going into it actively telling you that this is the case. Seems like a step in the right direction to me.

[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What is your point? There's a difference between a bag and a molecule and it really seems like you're just embarrassing yourself.

[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 1 points 1 month ago

Why in God's name would we put weapons that pose a legitimate threat to the whole of humanity under the control of an ai? I just don't think this one sounds plausible.

view more: next ›