Hackerman_uwu

joined 1 year ago
[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Mostly we just make up our own race. I’ve pretty much settled on “dark white”.

[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Also in the industry and I gotta say it’s not often I agree with every damn point. You nailed it. Thanks for posting!

[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There’s a human centipede that goes from Putin to Trump to Musk. That’s why they are doing it.

[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The original was a time and a place thing imo. It was a vibe that had a lot to do with the music, a lot to do with the awful circumstances surrounding Brandon’s death. You know at the time there were conspiracies a surrounding those circumstances tying into the death of Bruce Lee too so the movie had this lore to it from the start. The other thing worth mentioning is that at the time goth/industrial (dare I say it…) emo were an actual thing. I personally saw the first film in 16 up docs, my girlfriends skinny jeans and yes a touch of the old eyeliner. What I’m saying is it was relevant to a subset of the youth market. Not sure that’s true today.

[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Laugh quietly please. I still have a Meridian DAC that transcodes MQA. Among the gullible audiophile set there are tens of us. FML.

[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

As a bedroom producer who spent his children’s college money on analogue synths: go fuck yourself asshole.

[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Two body problem.

[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (9 children)

Is this real though? Does ChatGPT just literally take whole snippets of texts like that? I thought it used some aggregate or probability based on the whole corpus of text it was trained on.

[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

When you paste that code you do it in your private IDE, in a dev environment and you test it thoroughly before handing it off to the next person to test before it goes to production.

Hitting up ChatPPT for the answer to a question that you then vomit out in a meeting as if it’s knowledge is totally different.

[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Agreed. Reddit now has ai generated echo chambers.

[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Echo chambers were literally the biggest issue with that site. Now it chatGPTs itself?

 

So after a run in with a moderator yesterday I’ve had some thoughts I felt I wanted to share.

I won’t name them here, you are welcome to look at my comment history and make up your own mind.

In this instance a user posted some misinformation. I don’t think they intended to, they merely perpetuated a myth, they clearly simply knew no better.

I tried to respond diplomatically, they doubled down, other users piled on, the downvotes are plenty and then I responded with an article citing evidence supporting my assertions.

I also stated that the burden of proof lies with the claimant and asked for some context on why they seemed dead set on the lie they were aping back, asking if they subscribe to other myth based beliefs, religions, etc. That post was unceremoniously deleted with no notice to me and no reasons given… until the user pointed out in another post that they are the sole mod of the community and warned me that they were “not afraid to ban” me should I “cross the line” in a very *‘I’m the sheriff of this here town’ *tone. Which gave me a chuckle.

That’s my side of the story, it’s all there if you want to draw your own conclusions. It really doesn’t matter who is right or wrong in a ‘someone is wrong on the internet’ spat but I did spot a chink in the fediverse through this incident.

The real point here is that this kind of behaviour is one of things that made Reddit fucking awful and I’d hate to see it flourish here in the fediverse.

I don’t have the solutions just some suggestions that I’d be keen to hear others opinions on:

  1. No moderation without representation. IOW: mods should be democratically elected.
  2. Mod elections should be annual and no mod should enjoy that status for life.
  3. There should be a mechanism for inducing a ‘no confidence’ mode election at any time otherwise the communities are likely to splinter into “real_” communities just as they did on Reddit which no community in the fediverse can currently afford.

What say you my brothers and sisters and everything in between? Is there a way to safeguard against cronyism, corruption and other frailties of the human ego?

view more: next ›