Isoprenoid

I wasn't arguing for the existence of god.

Let me break this down:

• "There is a god." --> Burden of proof
• "There is no god." --> Burden of proof
• "Hey, man. I don't know." ---> No burden of proof

No. A negative can be proven. It's done all the time in science and mathematics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)#Proving_a_negative

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_of_impossibility

You have made the assertion, thus you have the burden of proof.

"what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence" QED

Careful, many online atheists don't understand that they have to prove a negative. That they have to prove the assertion: "There is no god."

The default position is that there is yet insufficient evidence to draw a conclusion.

Edit: Thank you for the downvotes, you have provided me with further evidence that online atheists don't understand that they have to prove a negative. Your butthurt fuels me.

At their second jobs.

It's over a decade ago so here is a video for those OOTL.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2OPnZEXoVGs

You could move your mouse and the container would move causing the beads to fly around.

They did a similar thing for Black and White where you could drag your mouse across the screen to mess with the stars.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZd5M_EF_t8

Fml I’m going to have to learn what a package manager is ew

Two minutes later

"Wait, you mean I get fast, convenient package delivery without being advertised to?"

delaying the start of her maternity leave

"Hey, can you give birth a little later? It's totally going to hurt our performance metrics this quarter."

I wonder if people working there realize that, or they have simply fell for the gaslighting.

Or they're just like everyone else and are desperate for money to live so they sell their souls.

Give it time.